Hearns-Pac Leonard-Floyd Both are silly polls. It's impossible to really tell how guys do in different eras, but Hearns and Leonard are probably two of the easiest to predict. Leonard has everything. Everything. And Hearns, while he wasn't as complete as Leonard in every area, had some dynamic attributes that made up for it. As far as the thread, I dont think it ends as quickly as Duran, but I don;t think Pac would be able to clear the hurdle of catching a right hand whenever Hearns wanted to deliver it. And he also had the outside boxing skills that he relied on against Leonard, of all people. Pac has no options in this one.
Pacquiao ahead on all cards after 10 rounds, decides to go for a knockout and walks into a Thomas Hearns check hook laying him out for 10
Watch more boxing. Hearns was close to outboxing Sugar Ray Leonard. Sugar ****ing Ray Leonard. Kid had outside boxing skills, and was not afraid to use every bit of his height. Pac wouldn't outbox Hearns for 10 Rounds.
Pac surprised me against Oscar, Ricky and Miguel. And he has it in him to beat Floyd, maybe. But Tommy ???? No. Just, NO.
I accidentally clicked Hearns by KO but I really meant to click Pac by KO. For anybody that's keeping score, take out 1 KO from Hearns and add 1 KO for Pacquiao. :good
PAC will last longer than Duran. Pac needs to jump in order to hit Hearns face :rofl How about Hearns vs Pbf?!: It would not happen. Pbf will demand 70% purse, will ask for additional blood tests etc etc...:!: