Julian Jackson .Vs. Roberto Duran

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Jun 28, 2010.


  1. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Foster was not a very skilled fighter.
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    I'm a Toney diehard, so I'm not going to start waxing lyrical about how Foster would stop him - I can't even remember saying that anyway. I'm not saying I didn't say it, because right now I think Foster would have every chance of KO'ing anyone over 15 at 175, but anyway it's not a debate I want to have. All I'll end by saying is: KO4 Dick Tiger.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't think anyone on this thread has said anything to the contrary thus far. I don't think he was very skilled either. He was a positively evil puncher though.
     
  4. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I'd go for Duran here as well at junior middleweight. At that time he would of had too much of everything for Jackson.
     
  5. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Do you rate him above Julian Jackson?
     
  6. Jersey Joe

    Jersey Joe Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    7
    Mar 8, 2005
    This would be a classic fight. I would give Jackson the edge just because he was that much bigger and still a decent fighter, certainly better than Barkley not to mention a much bigger puncher.

    Also it depends what version of Duran shows up. Leonard I/Barkley/Moore, or the one that lost to Kirkland Laing? The fat lazy version of Duran would get KTFO in 3 rounds by Jackson.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    I did a while back. Now I think I'd go for Jackson. But I think they are history's non-heavyweight top two for sure, even better than Hearns.
     
  8. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    118
    Oct 9, 2008
    Not prior to 1990........:bbb

    MR.BILL
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    118
    Oct 9, 2008

    Most of us 'Duran' fans know that......:bbb

    MR.BILL
     
  10. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    Toney was a hack at 175.Even worse than Nunn as a supermiddle.
     
  11. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,633
    1,125
    Feb 19, 2006
    Jackson was maybe the biggest puncher I have ever seen, that and he is vastly underrated. But Duran is the best fighter I have ever seen, period. Jackson does not have the a huge physical advantage over Duran, though he can hit harder. Duran was a surprisingly effective defensive fighter, with a great chin (I consider the Hearns fight an anomaly). All being considered I think Duran slowly muggs Jackson and TKOs him in 10.
     
  12. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,134
    16,871
    Jun 9, 2007
    What weight are we talking here?
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    275
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hence 'If Toney is at his best at 175, a big if' - I'm talking a return to his 168 form, although he wasnt too bad against Griffin
     
  14. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    I agree Spot on post:good