http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=24331&more=1 ****ing hell, I'm no Froch fan but this article is a wee bit biased to say the least. At first I just thought the writer disliked Froch but, after a couple of hints early on, the true motive becomes clear near the end.
I dont know why they let these completely biased articles get up on the site, makes it look so amatuer
what the ****? that was ****ing pathetic, the kind of thing that should only be a thread in the GF, not a ****in article on the main website. awful. what was the point of the article?
What a load of tripe. The paragraph about the Taylor fight is nonsense: "For Eleven and Three quarter rounds, Taylor schooled Froch". That clearly didn't happen.
The guy is not a good writer. Simple as that. His arguments are as lame as his style. And his e-mail address boxingfannumber1 or whatever it is should be renamed to This content is protected