Why Khan beats JMM, and his resume is as good

Ok, pro's and cons.

Kahn Pro's:

Faster
Better footwork
technically better
Better reach
stronger
more powerful puncher

Khans cons:
Glass Jaw
Defence needs improving
Green

JMM pro's:
Experience
Better defence
Better counter puncher
Prime

JMM cons:
Glass jaw
weak power
Lacks heart
static
stunted arms and legs
likes golden showers

Khan should beat JMM with little to no trouble, the worry is always about that glass jaw, but as far as boxing ability, Khan should destroy JMM.

I add that Khan at his tender age, already has a resume to equal JMM's, Pauline and Barerra are as good as grandpa Casa and **** sucker Diaz.( Barerra doesn't count, massive robbery)

 

Watch JMM vs Mayweather, he was a static ***** who was getting beaten up, did he go out on his shield? did he try and win with a big punch? Nooooo

Hatton did, Hatton is a terrible boxer, but Hatton knew he was losing to Mayweather and gave it his all, all or nothing, as the SAS say, ''who dares wins'' JMM was content to get a payday and be humiliated by Mayweather, that shows a lack of heart.

 

Get lost alias noob, this is serious boxing talk only, you clearly cannot weigh in with any factual points, therefore you're now banned.

 

Its funny when all these alias accounts no ones heard of before all suddenly start posting at once, never about boxing, but tedious insults at me.

 

So what are you complaining about then?

Khan would batter JMM, and it would be lopsided, I doubt JMM wins 1 round, if he does, maybe the 1st due to Khans nerves.

JMM doesn't even have a punchers chance, and his resume is ****ing terrible for a supposed ''great'' fighter.

Anyway I have to go to my boxing gym now, I shall see if any counter claims have been made later,

Cheerio Bullet Train