Just have to get this off my chest

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Jul 8, 2010.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I hate when people brush aside some of the old time greats. simply because they think their style is primitive.

    The biggest one that irks me is when people use this reasoning to the guy in my avatar, Jack Johnson.


    If Blackburn, who trained Louis, fought in Jack Johnsons time, how can the discrepancy really be as dramatic as people make it out to be?

    You guys have read Dempseys fight manual.....you know just by reading that book that all the techniques were there. In fact, the fighters were probably more technical back then.


    But people act as if Johnson's style cannot dominate the way Dempsey or Louis would. People naturally assume that his style was just too old.


    Am I crazy or does anyone else notice this mentality around these boards?
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jack Johnson lost to O Brien,was given a gift draw against Jim Johnson, fought a Burns who had yellow fever,was kod by Smith, ducked Jeanette, Mcvey ,and Langford, was nearly ko d by Ketchel, fought a drugged Jeffries.
    Johnson could not fight at range, had a weak chin ,was a coward, and all round nasty man. MENZODA
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yep, most people here are talking out their ass.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's interesting though, that for his day, Johnson was seen as an unbeatable out-boxer, a man who had to be fought inside in order for him to be beaten. When Kauffman tried to box Johnson, writers of the day despaired. How you going to out-box him?

    Now, Johnson is not seen that way. He's superbly strong, his best punch is the right uppercut inside. He's seen as an in-fighter now, more than an out-fighter, I think. Would you, anyone else, say that is fair?

    The reason for this transition (if it exists) is the change in fight-style. I think combination punching is different, I think the jab is different. Watching Johnson jab, he used it almost as a punch that he would land if the opportunity presented itself - it was an opportunists punch. Who, fighting in 2010, treats the jab in that way? Nobody. Mike Tyson of all people makes some excellent observations to this end. From 2:40.
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orxmkDJ_o3U[/ame]

    "For his time he was a defensive genius...nowadays it's so much more difficult to do that. People throw 7,8 punches at a time. One of them has to catch you if you're not elusive with your body, since he wasn't elusive with his body he just caught the punches."


    Some of this is not bang on, but I do think he is right about Johnson not being spectacularly elusive. This, combined with his rather static style and general dis-interest in the jab as a combination builder and points gatherer leads me to believe he couldn't use this style in 2010.

    Would he be successful in 2010? Of course. Enormously so. I suspect he would be #1, smaller than the Klitschko brothers though he may be. But he wouldn't use the style we see on film. It would be altered for the modern ring. But with his speed, stamina, strength, power and brilliant gift for ring strategy he would be great, in a new way. He'd be a millionaire these days, many times over. People would love him.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    The Klitschkos certainly dont throw 7 or 8 punches at a time.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    Occasionally Wladimir does throw a volume combination.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtfMDVGJdxM[/ame]

    At 0:00 you can see him throw a five punch combination.

    At 0:15 you can see I think a six punch combination.

    At 0:17 you can see him fire an eight punch combination.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    True. But the fighters of Johnson's era threw more than one or two at a time sometimes too. Some possibbly a lot more than the Klitschkos do.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    Most definitely. I think you would not find it difficult to find a HW who throws more punches than the Klitschko brothers in Johnson's era.

    But I wouldn't advise a man of Johnson's dimensions to box with that style in 2010 either.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I agree. Though the lack of film of Johnson against stiff opposition and a variety of opponents might lead us into making assumptions about his style.
    If we had a similar selection for Muhammad Ali we'd probably hear similar things being said about him.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think Ali would always show that mobility. He did against static guys like Williams and Terrell.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Those were great peak performances against big tall opponents.
    I wouldn't suggest that Johnson ever had that type of mobility, but what we see on film is him coasting against men he simply doesn't need to show any body movement with. Or past-prime showings against second-raters.

    I can find a lot worse for Ali than this (and against lesser opponents), but imagine if this was one of his major "prime" filmed performances :

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ce0CRelHcg[/ame]

    Even when he shows the dancing and mobility, there's no evidence that it equates to any sort of elusiveness. He's getting hit plenty by a man who, if this was in B&W, would be dismissed as a primitive brawler.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well Johnson took it easy. That was his style. There's basically no evidence, to my knowledge, that he fought in a style that different from the one we have on film. You think otherwise?
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Wlad looks terribly off balance throwing some of them combos.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    No, I think he fought in the same style. But I dont assume he didn't have ways of making his style work against combination punchers, taller men, better opponents etc.

    It's often the case that great fighters get people saying "that wouldn't work against X, Y or Z", but when we put them in the ring they prove us wrong. They show some nuance or ability that we'd missed before, or just hadn't been needed.

    Tyson's comments from 1987 are interesting. But it's ironic that around the same time Tyson was being stifled by some of his opponents who wouldn't let him get off more than one or two punches at a time, tie him up, and after 4 or 5 rounds Mike would be prone to get lazy and throw just the one at a time for long periods of rounds. And this was in the Kevin Rooney days.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,978
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well my assumption is based upon what I see on film. This makes it no more or less valid than any other opinion based around film, but my reasons for feeling this way are in this thread in minor detail.

    Sure it does, but Johnson, arguably, didn't even prove himself versus the best HW's of his time. For me, it's a far bigger leap to say that he could beat modern HW's with an unaltered style than it is to say that he doesn't look like he could do it based upon what is on film.