i'm just wondering why you chose the david telasco fight in particular roy has looked better in other fights hell i thought he looked better against clinton woods (at least roy tried to box in a more orthodox manner)
please tell me you really dont belive that jones was anywhere near his best when he fought joe his ****ing legs were so gone and could not let his hands go at all
I dont think he was as far gone as people like to say. By all means ask if you care to know, why I think that
Jones of 94-98? Dominates Calzaghe at any point in Calzaghe's career Jones of 99-2004 -I think it's a toss up fight. Jones after 2004 - Any version of Calzaghe beats him.
Calzaghe UD. Jones could only ever pull stunts against taxi drivers and spanish waiters, could see something similar to shot Jones vs shot Calzaghe, albeit Jones puts in a better showing and less clowning from Calzaghe.
u think its a toss up with the jones that fought woods [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNl5aI4Gokk[/ame]
this is perhaps the most relevant post on the thread :deal fantastic boxing movie from highly respected esb titan 46and0 :yep
Appreciate the plaudits Headbanger. :happy You too are one of the top 5 posters on ESB. I've never seen you lose a debate yet. You also have a superb total of vCash, so your boxing knowledge is beyond questioning. :deal
what i like about your stunning feature movie is the realism involved. the combination punching involved is true to life and the knockdown featured was almost as though jones had re-matched c-level gate keeper glen johnson :deal
i dont care to know ive watched jones since 1989 and belive me that was no were near jones best his legs were fried and he could not let his hands go