Ok but that statement in itself is a dumb as thing to say and is so not accurate. This content is protected
I think I gave 12 to castillo and 11 to mayweather, I don't remember though, you'll have to look at my rbr in the other thread. I was pretty much in line with harold letterman.
Not accurate to you. I personally feel Morales was a better boxer in his prime with more talent. Oh, and he had the courage to fight pacquiao... 3 times.
Sorry dude, as biased as you are for floyd, I am for action fighters with skill. I could give a **** less how good your defense is if you're not delivering a fight. Floyd is a low offense 1/2 as good James Toney. Pernell Whitaker and James Toney make floyd look like a pot shotting joke.
Merchant, Lampley and Lederman thinks Castillo won. Their belief was backed up with the compubox tally. That's all that's needed.
CompuBox backed up Marquez in his robbery vs Pacquiao. Who do you think won? :think [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJJZoCnqNRM[/ame]
lol, this aint olympic boxing, where you're trying to score the most points by touching the most.... theres many other considerations taken, including effective punching...
Just for the record, not it doesnt, it backs up Pac in fact. JMM landed slightly more punches overall, however the match is not scored overall but round by round. If you were to collect who won each round based on compubox stats, factor in the KD, Pac won, backed up by compubox stats. Your example = Fail.