'19 Dempsey vs. '52 Marciano.... Take it or leave it?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, Jul 2, 2010.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,746
    Sep 14, 2005
    Chris,

    Unbelievable post. Could not agree more, and could not have said it better myself.


    And how many ATG heavyweight champions ducked the two best fighters of their era? Certainly not Rocky Marciano. Jack Dempsey did. In fact, Dempsey loved to fight LOSERS of title eliminators.
     
  2. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Very interesting.:deal

    MR.BILL:good
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Marciano basically had two stages in his career:
    pre-50s - 1952
    1954-1956

    During the first stage, he was a pure, one-punch knockout artist and stopped his opponents using one or just a few punches - i.e., Louis, Walcott 2x, The Kid and Layne. During this period, he threw about 40-50 punches a round, but never slowed intensity-wise, as the first Walcott bout illustrates. In the other stage of his career, he became more of a volume puncher that grinds his opponent down. This was the case most notably against Charles, Cockell & Moore.

    Bottomline is that he retained his ability to stop the opponent and has scored several few-punch KOs. The same can't be said of Jackieboy.


    You can talk about age all you want, but fact:

    1. Walcott, Moore and Louis were still very good in their 30's;
    2. Marciano's opponents were better than Dempsey's;
    3. Marciano at least fought the top opposition, Dempsey avoided the two best fighters of his time.
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    I too, will give Marciano the edge in opposition over Demps...... Aside from "Jim Flynn & Gunboat Smith" and some other pre-1919 fights, Demps KO'd a lot of bad-ass drunks and coal miners looking for quick cabbage...... No, Demps didn't KO bums and stiffs, but he did KO a lotta' wanna be fighters who lacked stamina and skill after several rds of heated action......

    However, the Dempsey nuts will claim everyone Jack fought was able to go 20 rds without breathing......... BULL****!! J.D. KO'd his share of ham and eggers.........

    I'm leaning toward Marciano over Dempsey in a time machine......

    MR.BILL
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,646
    9,698
    Jul 15, 2008
    Walcott and Charles both lost to Rex Layne within the window they fought Marciano. That defines where they were in their career. Louis was a shell whose legs and power were a fragment of what they were in his prime. I agree all were good for the time which proves to what degree Marciano also benefitted from the time he fought.

    Name the ten best fighters Marciano fought.

    Dempseys were:

    Willard
    Fulton
    Tunney
    Sharkey
    Brennen
    Miske
    Gibbons
    Carpienter
    Morris
    Levinskiy
    Smith
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,734
    3,580
    Jul 10, 2005
    And your relly going to argue the likes of Willard and Fulton are over Charles and Walcott?

    1 Walcott would be about ten Willard's imo.
     
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,456
    15,636
    Jun 9, 2007
    Are we forgetting that Charles and Walcott were past there primes.
     
  8. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,734
    3,580
    Jul 10, 2005

    And Jess Willard was in his prime also?
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,646
    9,698
    Jul 15, 2008
    My argument regarding Marciano is that in his whole career he fought six fighters of any worth. LaStarza was a decent, small cruiserweight, not likely to make any list of top twenty cruisers. Layne was a decent 200 pound contender that is in no one's top fifty heavyweights ever. Then you have Louis, Walott, Charles and Moore. All hall of fame great fighters. All well past their primes when fighting Marciano who was the young man. They averaged 37 years of age. This is fact.

    To me Dempsey proved more as an older fighter against prime greats Sharkey and Tunney than Marciano did as a young man beating great names past their prime. I pick the Sharkey and Tunney Dempsey fought over any of those four without uetion. This is simply how I see it .

    I am also waiting for the list of the ten best guys Rocky fought ...
     
  10. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    It is true that Jesse Willard was near or at age 36 compared to Dempsey's 24 yrs in 1919. Plus, Ol' Willard was 245 soft pounds in Toledo compared to the tight 230 he weighed in 1915 for his KO over J.J. down in Cuba........ Willard was ready to be mugged when Dempsey got a hold of Jesse's ass in Toledo......

    I think Marciano's task of kayoing Joe Wally for the title in '52 was much more impressive and meaningful......

    MR.BILL
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Can never write Marciano off completely, but I think Dempsey was just better in all the right areas. Dempsey by KO probably.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,646
    9,698
    Jul 15, 2008
    Dempsey's opponents barely knew how to box ? Do you know how uneducated you sound making this statement about a fighter like Gibbons ? What footage are you basing this definative statement on? There is no need to split hairs with you ... you are clearly one of the gus that believe there was a magic line that sepated a quantum leap in boxing, as if a jab and a combination started with the black murderers row ... I will only say you are very wrong. Jusr remember,Jack Blackburn taught Joe Louis. The fact that Baby Gaga is humping your leg in excitement over your post should be sign enough to you that you are way off track.
     
  13. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    382
    Dec 19, 2009
    It would be amazing.

    I think the taller Dempsey would jump all over Marciano right away. I think Dempsey's fast combinations and high workrate would serve him well in the early rounds. I also think this tactic would keep him in range for some payback from Marciano as well. Maybe, just maybe Dempsey can drop Marciano within the first 4 rounds.

    After 4 or 5 rounds Marciano would still be fresh, still throwing bombs, and his workrate would actually be at it's highest. Dempsey's output would be on the decline and the snap on his punches would be on a slight decline as well.

    After 8 or 9 rounds Marciano will have taken control. The fight is still close but things are going Marciano's way for the most part.

    After 12 or 13 rounds Marciano is up by a few rounds and still looks good. Dempsey is starting to look pretty well beat up.

    In round 13 or 14 the fight reaches it's climax, both try to end the fight and throw everything that they have left. Both men get rocked ut Marciano drops Dempsey with a great hook to the body, uppercut, hook to the head combo. Demspey is up at 8 and the fighters continue. With only a few seconds left in the round Marciano lands a great right hand the puts Dempsey down and out.
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    That scenario is almost too good to be true......... Kinda' like Space Mountain....... Christ, I haven't been to Disneyland in about 10 or 12 yrs........
    :deal:bbb

    MR.BILL
     
  15. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,456
    15,636
    Jun 9, 2007
    How do you know Dempseys opponents could barly box? Were you there?Have you seen footage of them?