Of course its on. Harrison has a glass jaw & "0" chance to beat Haye. Why do you think he cherry picked that opponent?
I was more mentioning the drugged water than the loss. I have no problems with losses. Haye has a loss on his record but its a perfectly acceptable one. Carl Thompson was an extremly respectable opponent for someones 10th fight. Personally had Mayweather winning. try watching without the commentary trust me. Do the same with Holyfield vs Valuev to. Also has Marquez winning twice. Plus all those you mentioned were world class fighters. Brewster and Sanders were not. A better example would be Lennox Lewis. Knocked out twice to sub par guys and came back. Most would have Lewis in there top 10-15 HWs of all time.
Wlad never blamed any one because of his loss. He only says he felt tired after two rounds against Brewster, and he wants to know what was wrong with him. IMO he was drugged no doubt of it. But Wlad never blamed any one. But this fight was 6 years ago. And if Wlad is so easy to beat, why is Haye fighting Harrison?
I knew you were talking about the drugging and not the loss mate; i was aiming that more at the peeps that rag on Wlad for that one since they won't leave it be. & Yeah I should have included Lewis getting KO'd. But the whole Lewis & the Klits situation is hotly contested so thought I'd leave that one alone!
Exactly.....it would be a great fight. As much as most would rightly had Wald as the clear favourite, Haye has the power to knock Wlad out. Would certainly be more exciting than some of Wlads recent fights.
But Haye refuses to fight Wlad. 50:50 was more than fair. Without options! Haye and his people know, that Haye would loose to Wlad.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected