I can understand their choice of skipping Mosley. He fought Cotto who beat Mosley and that, you can't disagree, was a top fight. About Bradley, why would he fight Bradley when a lineal official #1 fighter in Hatton was already there?, that was the man to fight and beat not Bradley. Now he's looking to fight one of the greatest defensive fighters of this generation in Mayweather his self, the king of this style, so I don't see why this "ducking slicksters" makes sense when they are trying to fight the king of that style. It's not Pacquiao's fault slick fighters didn't exist in the lower weight divisions he was dominating.
and you would be the same joyboy who would criticize pac if he chooses and dismantles a drained 140 or 142 mosley over a 145 cotto.
They should at least put Manny in with a fast guy with some movement.Fighting slow guys with recent losses isn't going to get it. Cotto had been KTFO by the guy Shane totally destroyed. Cotto was still wearing a fesh ass-whipping..that's why Roach cherrypicked him. Hatton...like Cotto...was there to be had...He was almost KTFO by a LIGHWEIGHT named Lazcano. There were more recent chances to fight Bradley/
floyd won't go near a fighter below 35 years old. he is taking his father's advice very well to avoid fighting pac at all cost.
Manny won't fight anybody with speed and movement. You gotta be a dead man to get a fight with the Pinoy *****.
How about you provide me a source saying Pacquaiao signed the contract this year? Did Pacquiao sign yet? What's in the contract? See you don't have answers to any of these questions but you still run off at the Damn mouth about some **** you don't know nothing about.