Timbo Bradley:"Catchweights are pathetic"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Jul 13, 2010.


  1. bucktoof

    bucktoof achondroplasiaphobia Full Member

    446
    0
    May 21, 2009
    catchweights are bull****. hated it when pac fought cotto, thought it was bull**** from the start.

    timmeh is right, no sarcasm.
     
  2. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    All the *****s do.

    I'm the biggest ******* on the forum according to most of these floyd blowing 12 year olds.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Why? I want to see the best fights possible and, as I said, if Calzaghe and Hopkins met in their primes, 164lbs would be the fairest weight for them to fight at. It would give neither man an advantage and that's the way it should be in big fights.

    Obviously both men have to agree but if they do, there's no issue.
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Exactly.
     
  5. bucktoof

    bucktoof achondroplasiaphobia Full Member

    446
    0
    May 21, 2009
    if pac ends up fighting cotto for his 154 belt at another catchweight, no lie i think i'll say **** it and root for cotto.
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Tell me please (with a straight face), did the 145 pounds have any bearing on Cotto's performance on the night?
     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    According to Cotto, it meant nothing.

    I am a huge cottard, so I would look for an excuse, but pac is just too good for cotto(not to mention most other fighters in this weight class)
     
  8. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    nothing wrong with catchweights

    some of the all time great fighters fought at catch weights

    wasn't chavez vs whitaker at a catchweight?
     
  9. bucktoof

    bucktoof achondroplasiaphobia Full Member

    446
    0
    May 21, 2009
    i don't know, probably not, so why ask for it in the first place?

    straight up, i'm biased for pac, and the 145 catchweight taints that victory just a lilttle bit. he proved he didn't need it, but even if he lost at 147 to cotto, he would've lost to the bigger man, no shame in that.

    that catchweight bs just gives pac haters another target to shoot at.


    i like what timmy's saying. es el mas machooooo!
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    He's using Leonard as an example of catch weight fights :patsch
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    how did you get so much vcash?
     
  12. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    how many catchweights did leonard have, 2?
     
  13. wendel

    wendel Member Full Member

    262
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    I actually disagree. Catchweights, like official weight classes are just arbitrary numbers. Two fighters are rarely built the same way, so even in official weight classes, the weight will favor one fighter over the other. The only difference between a catchweight and official weight is that one was given a title. The only people what would care are those who want to blame losses/wins on the weight.
    Now if we're talking title defense at catchweights, well that's the only debatable point, but I wouldn't care either way either. If you are not comfortable making a certain weight, then don't fight in it. If you agreed and lose, it's your own fault, just like if you've trained poorly.
     
  14. bucktoof

    bucktoof achondroplasiaphobia Full Member

    446
    0
    May 21, 2009
    vBookie glitch. i pm'ed IB about it to avoid the ban hammer.
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Hopkins went straight from 160 to 175. There would've been no need for him to fight Calzaghe at a catchweight if they had fought in their prime. Catchweights are less neccesary these days as there are too many divisions as it is. There is still a place for them though. If a fighter is moving up multiple divisions at once, then a catchweight is fair. Also, if a guy is moving up multiple divisions over a relatively short period of time, then a catchweight may be in order as well.

    In the past, catchweights were used to make seemingly unrealistic fights a reality. Over time, some fighters have used them simply as a way to try to handicap their opponent.