What motivates you people?

The Louisville Lip was disliked. He only gained acceptance later.

 

It is a FACT nobody (sane) picks Pac to hang with Leonard. You don't dispute it or give your perspective. You just use a smiley. This is a perfect example of what I mean by you "saying nothing". Handle them Luke! :good

You picking SRR to ALWAYS beat EVERYBODY just shows YDKSAB. IMHO SRR would have his hands full with SRL, TH, JCC, and FMJ. Boxing was different then.

 

i was gonna break it down.. but then i thought.. i can't be arsed.

 

I defended you going down a rabbit hole about something that had NOTHING to do with the point the guy was making. It was transparent redirection.

 

I pick him to beat mayweather 10 our of 10 times.

I never made a claim for anyone else.

 

Right. You knew you had nothing for it.

Pac isn't the #1 draw in boxing.
If he is p4p best why in the hell is he the underdog?

On and on...

 

Rockgloves has already had his chin cracked, had a year lay-off, and is being pulled down in weight. This fight is an embarrassing whitewash victory for Pacquiao. Rockgloves doesn't win any twenty-second segment in the entire fight.

 

Uhhhh, wrong.

It was exactly the point I made he was lying about.

You are 100% wrong.

He was lying and you were trying to change the subject to something I didn't even care about.

 

i've never seen either of those posters before.. that **** is messed up!!!

 

Exactly what I said.

 

Yep. I'd pick Leonard to beat Robinson. Tommy Hearns would have had issues with his chin against Robinson, but would win several if they fought ten times. Floyd definitely doesn't go 0/10 as suggested. That's absurd.

 

I like how half of this thread still turned out to be a debate (and I use the word "debate" lightly) between Pac fans and Floyd fans.

 

is it the third one?

that's my favourite

 

What fighter has floyd beat that gives you the impression he can beat robinson?

 

If you say so. The dude made slight mistake about the source when the statement was the same. His point was the content of the statement, but you just went off... like now. I can't remember it specifically so it is what it is.