Genaro Hernandez, Ricky Hatton and Castillo were all considered prime when Floyd beat them and are likely HOFers.
When you saw a poll saying "who wins, robinson or floyd" you didn't say "robinson most likely takes it but floyd has a chance" You said "floyd would win" That is the definition of absurdity.
Ricky Hatton was a ? Castillo was prime, I agree, but that doesn't mean much considering I think he beat floyd and was robbed of his best victory. Gernaro retired after the fight.
LMAO! His father was half the fighter he was, fought Leonard on a few days notice, and lasted damn near the whole fight. You don't count that though huh?
Yep. I love the old fighters as much as anyone, but this sort of stuff is just comical. No one in the history of the sport from 147lbs down can beat Floyd ten for ten. Not one. That includes guys who would be favoured over Floyd like Leonard (who I think would be Floyd's kryptonite) and Hearns.
He got ****ing raped by Leonard. Leonard broke that philly shell in the first round and destroyed Mayweather. "he almost lasted!!!!" LMAO
How do you know? Floyd has one of the shittiest WW resumes of anyone fighting. You guys are talking out of your ass for floyd on anything over 135. It's completely hypothetical.
This post right here just shows how little you lnow about boxing,Lamotta was down only once in his career and that was when he was past his best fighting at light heavy and you think a guy with average punching power like Floyd would put him on his butt,its laughable.
It's as hypothetical as you suggesting Robinson gets ten straight wins. Both are hypothetical. Yours is wrong.
Genaro Hernandez in his prime ?he was in his 30's and had clearly slowed down by the time Floyd fought him,you guys just make **** up and try to slip them up as facts.
Yeah because you say so with no evidence. Floyd would beat SRR... if he was 40 years old. I'm sure he'd take him then.