The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Could Mayweather losing to Pacquiao really be labeled, "humiliating?"
     
  2. Twirdman

    Twirdman Active Member Full Member

    538
    0
    Nov 24, 2009
    No sorry that doesn't ****ing work. If your going to claim a guy doesn't have a good chin you have to back that up. He's taken solid hits and hasn't even flinched from them. He hasn't been knocked down for a very long time. So how is his chin questionable. And how does fighting boxers with no defense show anything about his chin, defense doesn't knock people out. And you want a defensive boxer theres JMM wasn't knocked down then. Pac has probably one of the best chins out there how the **** can you say its not good?
     
  3. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008

    last time i check it was floyd who is on vacation and is not really thinking about fighting(pacquiao) right now.:hi:
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    again mosley fought a margo who is not himself. being without his bricks is not even the point, it was his state of consciousness. he was not in the fight fearing of what will be his sanctions because he was just caught. meanwhile cotto fought a full of confidence margo.

    if you think cotto (#2 welter back then) was downgrade from a mosley fight, then you have some issues. it's not even a matter of roach saying mosley was that good but a matter of promotions. if mosley was a TR back then, arum would have pushed that fight instead of cotto. besides cotto is about to change boats back then and arum had to match his 2 top stars in his stable. mosley is arguably not necessarily a better challenge for pac back then if pac fought cotto who has a win over mosley and was in his prime.
     
  5. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    since then?
     
  6. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010

    since then hes fought diaz who wasnt all that
    a severly weight drained de la hoya
    a washed up over rated shot hatton
    a shot cotto who was slightly weight drained
    and a paid off clottey
     
  7. time

    time Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,525
    7
    Dec 18, 2009
    Yep both floyd and pac have been well managed alrite, personally i hate that scumbag cheato getting a shot, not deserved at all, imo he should be banned for at least another year and not get a mega fight back like he is doing, roach just wants someone whos easy to hit, even though i cant stand cheato i hope he gives pac a big fright
     
  8. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    clottey was making that head go buckwild, if he opened up properly no doubt about bit he would have been stopped. hatton didnt land anything of note on him and cotto didnt land anyhing with conviction.

    but maybe i overstated that a bit ****wit, he has a decent chin but it will get smashed by someone who doesnt hit alot

    now **** off to pacland while i **** your mother
     
  9. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    WTF:patsch we talking about pac here. Amir Khan just got KTFO couple of years back. We know his chin is no good. Pac on the other hand has been in the ring with punchers like morales-barrera-marquez-cotto-delahoya(didn't really land much) and clottey and he never went down.

    Pac-Barrera 1 he was outbalance and his gloves touch the canvas. Considered a KD but you know what i mean when i say KD.
     
  10. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    is a point made or is a point made
     
  11. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    i thought pac didnt fight for money... only for pride and legacy :rofl
     
  12. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    i was saying your logic is rubbish... not that pac has a bad chin...

    obviously that went way over your head
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    you can do that to anybody if you can hate enough.

    floyd fought:

    an oscar who could not pull the trigger in a boring fight
    a hatton who is **** at 147
    a bloated 36 years old lightweight in jmm at 144, cheated him on scales and even failed to stop him in a boring fight
    a 39 years-old, shot and easily tired mosley.
     
  14. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    an ocar at his real weight
    a hatton who was a 147 world champ
    a jmm in a tune up fight after a few years out who also happened to be p4p number 3
    a mosley who people were going around saying floyd was scared to fight and who had been refreshed by sister naseem , also who destroyed pacs next opponent

    and guess what floyd beat them all and made it look easy
     
  15. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    Hatton had just came off of one of his best performance in nov 2008 against paulie malignaggi and all of a sudden his shot? :roll:

    Cotto shot? :rofl


    **** if that's the case then damn

    Marquez was what 36-37 yrs old blown up lightweight
    Mosley was 38 yrs old who hasn't fought in over a year

    If hatton 29 at the time and cotto 29 also are considered shot then marquez 36-37 and mosley 38 must be shot to pieces:rofl
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.