The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

It's only the victory over Barrera that makes Pacquiao's resume better than Mayweather's, take that fight out and there isn't much between them at all and if Mayweather does beat Pacquiao next year then his resume will be better.

 

don't you guys get sick of arguing the same **** over and over?

 

Appereantly they dont...I agree with you man, this **** has been done to death..More to boxing than Manny and Floyd!atsch

 

Only Barrera? you've got to be kidding. Not just he's winning tough opponents but also the way he do it, that's why people are now not satisfied if he doesn't fight Martinez, a full blown MW, for crying out loud. Even after that I bet some would still be not satisfied until he face the Klitschkos

 

Phillapino? Where on earth that came from?

 

Do you think that's enough time for Mayweather to grow up balls in order to fight Pac?:?
​

 

this is very idotic. why would pac fight bradley then who was just an upcoming fighter when hatton was the lineal and #1 140 champion back then? hatton also was well accepted by fans as a tough opponent that could give pac a challenge and present pac a more than enough rewards legacy wise and money wise. if he foght bradley then, he would have just beaten a young and upcomer boxer.

now you are asking him to fight williams, a close winner over margo but you condemn pac's move of fighting cotto who has a win over mosley. and please, oscar was a huge risk back then for pacquiao considering pac was moving 2 diviions up. would they know that oscar would **** up?

seriously you hae some issues dude. you are picking some points that suits you at hindsight. where are you then when these fights are about to made? you are probably one of them who thinks pac would lose to these guys. and all your opinion was based on what roach did said. if pac-floyd happens and if pac stopped or at least win against floyd, you will be one of those idiots who will quote roach again to discredit pac. you will say roach cherry-picked floyd because he has no legs and you would complain that pac should have fought ______ <-insert name of other welter that pac did not fought.

 

hatton was #1 LWW and paulie #2 when they fought, hatton had re-asserted his dominance of the division, you cant be serious in saying that at that time bradley was a tougher challenge, bradley who had just been floored twice by kendall fuking holt!

not the same cotto, but still him an mosley were clearly the top two WW's, yes cotto wasnt as good as he was, but still very good, good enough to destroy jennings and then beat clottey. like i says, only tougher fight would have been mosley so you cant knock a man for that, especially considering cotto already beaten mosley.

and i agreed with you bout margarito so what you on about.

 

His resume dose speak for itself. The thread starter is 100% correct.

 

he should have fought Zahir, Casamayor, Tim Bradley, Andre Berto instead of the above..

 

Of course, no Floyd fanboy touches this...

 

What a freaking joke.

Such a tired debate.

 

casamayor instead of diaz, hell anyone instead of diaz would have done.

didnt zahir get smashed off funeka tho?

and bradley + berto would never, ever be better than hatton + cotto.

 

Joshua Clottey (should've fought Mosley or Berto)

* I know they were signed to fight each other, but not before Arum signed Pac up to fight Top Rank's Clottey.

Miguel Cotto (Mosley was Lineal Welterweight Champion)

* not much beef here except for the unfair catchweight for a welter title fight

Ricky Hatton (already waxed by Floyd, Looked bad against Juan Lazano, and average against Paulie Malignaggi)

Oscar De La Hoya (fought soley for the pay day. Can't blame him for that although there was better competition out there)

David Diaz (Diaz had already been waxed by Kendall Holt and Juan Diaz so Manny should've fought Baby Bull or Nate Campbell over the pedestrian Diaz)

Pacquiao and Roach ducked Shane Mosley openly and wanted nothing to do with Cotto unless it was a catchweight, so people who hated on Floyd must keep these things in mind.

 

He could have and should have maybe fought Zahir. He would have been exposed big time.

cotto and hatton are tough fighters. He's got his definitions mixed up.