How can anyone rate Mayweather's win over Marquez?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Aug 1, 2010.


  1. jerryrard

    jerryrard Member Full Member

    496
    0
    May 3, 2009
    Going up in weight is part of boxing if you plan to stay in that weight for a while, and not just for one fight to cash in. Marquez should stay 135.
    0 props to Floyd for this fight. Negative 10 for cheating on the scales.
     
  2. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Many men have done it, but to varying effect. Not everyone is Pacquiao or Mayweather. Most can't go up more than two weight classes without a significant drop in quality. Marquez didn't look good going up in weight. He is still a great fighter, he just doesn't belong at 140...

    Hell look at Hatton! Hatton was a great Jr. Welter Weight fighter, but he looked like crap every time he moved up to Welter. Some people just can't make the transition...
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    :patsch Yeah, a grown-up slanders anyone who disagrees with him as 'clouded by bias'. You're a shining example to the rest of us.
     
  4. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    ****ing funny how in this instance *****s are disregarding the weight difference over the agreed catchweight, plus the fact that it's a whooping two division jump. Right it won't make a difference. While they're up in arms over Cotto going under 2 pounds from his last fight when he faced Pac.
     
  5. If Floyd become faster when he goes down in weight so do other boxers. Marquez definitely lost some speed. Now don't get me wrong, he was never blindingly fast to begin with, but its fair to say his speed was respectable. We all know that Marquez's power at 135 isnt what it was when he campaigned at 130 and 126. How was moving up in weight going to improve his power? Most fighters who step in the ring with Floyd are completely outboxed and outclassed anyways. Mosley could only rely on power. His speed virtually didnt matter. Floyd knew that making Marquez move up in weight would eliminate any threat Marquez might have posed at other weights. If you know your opponent cant hurt you and youre much faster than he his, i ask u: what chance does he have?
     
  6. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,912
    3,242
    Apr 26, 2010
    Well he didn't have a chance, but not because he came up in weight necessarily, but because he was outclassed. I have expressed my respect for JMM, but he was beaten by the clearly better fighter. I understand the value of weight and the potential effects both positive and negative on fighters, but in this case it wouldn't matter what weight they faught, PBF demonstrated he was clearly the better boxer. If they went down 10 lbs, you think it would have changed anything? I don't, I see no reason to believe that regardless of weight class, the obviously better fighter won.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,020
    20,621
    Sep 15, 2009
    i voted decent because that is how i saw it, it was a great performance against a man who, with hindsight, wasnt adept at that weight class.

    i mean that left hook floyd threw which dropped marquez, that was a beautiful shot, some of hid right hands where perfectly timed, it was a great performance, but only a decent win.

    it dont make his top ten list IMO.

    at the time i remember thinking that he shouldnt receive to much shiot providing his next fight was williams, mosley or pac. he was coming off a long layoff so i understand not taking a huge risk. he then fought mosley as the public demanded so i got no problems with it, but you cant rate it any higher than it was.

    the truth as i see it, is marquez wasnt good enough at that weight, yes duran and mosley and others made the jump, but they are remembered as absolute legends, and i doubt marquez will make that cut. pac made the jump successfully and marquez couldnt, he got no place above 135 if he is against a p4p contender, this is why talk or a rematch with pacman is disgusting.

    lets say the fight happens at 147, well we saw how floyd dominated him. lets say it happens at 140, we saw how sluggish he looked at 142, so 2 pounds lighter vs the best fighter in the world, well that would be a mismatch also imo.

    his best bet imo is vs khan, cos he has the timing and power to put him to sleep, doing that would make him a 4 weight champion and would be a good way to end a very good career.
     
  8. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I've had plenty of disscussions with that guy. I have a good idea about his rooting interests. I'm not making blind assumptions like you're doing here. And how the hell did I slander him? I don't even know why you even decided to involve yourself in our converstation.
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    I'm making no blind assumptions whatsoever. Cuchulain has no bias on the Pacquiao-Mayweather issue, he merely disagrees with you, and you are a known Mayweather cheerleader. I included myself in the argument because I wanted to. If you don't understand that accusing someone of bias is slandering them, then you'll have no problem with me calling you a biased ****wit.
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    First off, you clearly have no understanding of what slander actually is. Second, what exactly is your problem? I was having a civilized converstation with that guy. Why do you deem it neccesary to interject with your ignorance? If you want to have a civilized discussion with me, that's fine. However, if you just want to show off how ignorant and childesh you can be, I'm not interested. I don't have time for anymore of these pointless back and forths with you.
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    You implied his opinion was invalid because he is inherently biased. You did this publicly on a boxing forum, on my thread. I disagree entirely, possibly even vehemently, with your slanderous accusation, so I expressed my point of view. If you have a problem with that, you can either cry about it some more or **** off, because I am perfectly content with my intervention and will continue to do so forevermore. :good
     
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Incorrect. The implication was that his personal bias was skewing his viewpoint on the matter.

    This isn't your website so you couldn't possibly own any threads in here.

    You don't even know what slander is. You might want to look it up. You also have very little context as to the nature of the conversation I was having, and you have very little knowledge of the history I have with that poster. Quite simply put, you were, and still are, in no position to make the comments that you did in regards to that conversation.

    The only person crying is you. That's all you do. Just look at this thread, you're crying because you're claiming that I slandered another poster.:rofl You're intervention? Please tell me this is a joke.
     
  13. Partaxian

    Partaxian Active Member Full Member

    652
    0
    Sep 14, 2009
    The fact that people think jmm would get beat by khan at 140 says enough on what jam's chances were at 146 vs floyd. I think jmm ko's khan though, man is chinny n jmm can punch n land.
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    How does Khan beat Marquez when his chin can't take a soft jab? Khan goes out on his back in that fight.
     
  15. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    Wow... never seen anyone remain so respectful in the face of blind disrespect. Bravo sir