Was Dmitri Pirog on his way to getting robbed on Saturday night (07/31/10)?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RingKing, Aug 2, 2010.


Page 1 of 4
  1. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,007
    612
    Feb 21, 2008
    Here are the official scorecards of the fight:

    Judge: Duane Ford 39-37 | judge: C.J. Ross 39-37 | judge: Paul Smith 39-37. Now before anyone gets their panties in a bunch I do realize the fight still had a long way to go. However, seeing that the judges had Jacobs ahead in a fight I had it for Pirog up until the stoppage, how many of you believe the judges would have scored it for Jacobs? I believe the only round I gave Jacobs was the 3rd round. He actually did box nicely in that round. So lets hear it ESB.
     
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    #1
  2. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    Were they really the scores? Bloody hell! what you gotta do to win rounds over there? I thought he controlled the fight till he got the KO
     
    Kel1981, Aug 2, 2010
    Kel1981, Aug 2, 2010
    #2
  3. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,364
    542
    Sep 14, 2008
    Had it even after 4...Pirog the first two and Jacobs the third and fourth...
     
    CLUBBER, Aug 2, 2010
    CLUBBER, Aug 2, 2010
    #3
  4. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    It was 3-1 Jacobs, or 2-2. Pirog won the 2nd, and I'd have no problem with someone giving him the 4th.
     
    booradley, Aug 2, 2010
    booradley, Aug 2, 2010
    #4
  5. greatone

    greatone Active Member Full Member

    1,000
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    More money down the line if Jacobs won, so now way pirog would've got a decision. Same thing with tua vs Barrett. That's one thing that is wrong with boxing.
     
    greatone, Aug 2, 2010
    greatone, Aug 2, 2010
    #5
  6. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    well i had it 2-2 so i see no problem with there scores , they wernt decisive rounds either way
     
    hagman1989, Aug 2, 2010
    hagman1989, Aug 2, 2010
    #6
  7. CYoungblood95

    CYoungblood95 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,969
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    i had it 3-1 or 2-2, with the 1st to jacobs, 2nd to pirog, 3rd to jacobs, and 4th a tough one to score.
     
    CYoungblood95, Aug 2, 2010
    CYoungblood95, Aug 2, 2010
    #7
  8. greatone

    greatone Active Member Full Member

    1,000
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    Btw I lost $2000 vcash on that frickin fight.
     
    greatone, Aug 2, 2010
    greatone, Aug 2, 2010
    #8
  9. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,007
    612
    Feb 21, 2008
    I also forgot to mention if anyone gave Pirog a 10-8 round when he clearly hurt Jacobs. Or does anyone think it should have been called a knockdown? I know I may be talking to a small crowd here since not too many people bought the PPV or even watched that particular fight.
     
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    #9
  10. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,717
    3,531
    Jun 15, 2010
    I think you have to be a blind man to score it 3-1 to Jacob like the judges did.
    Pirog was pressing the attack
    Pirog was landing the cleaner shots
    Pirog was landing the harder shots

    It was all set GBP for there golden man to win. Pirog knew the score and ko'd that hyper bum.
     
    timeout, Aug 2, 2010
    timeout, Aug 2, 2010
    #10
  11. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    I said it before, Pirog was getting outworked. The uy has a relatively low punch output and it cost him rds and it will cost him a fight in the near future.

    I had it 2-2
     
    RightCross, Aug 2, 2010
    RightCross, Aug 2, 2010
    #11
  12. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,007
    612
    Feb 21, 2008

    I agree with you; however, I don't think calling Jacobs a hyper bum is fair because if Pirog had lost fair and square, I don't think you would be calling him a bum.
     
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    #12
  13. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,007
    612
    Feb 21, 2008
    I don't agree with that statement. Pirog may not have been a human windmill, but he was in there being measured in his attack. As a matter of fact, if he had been going balls out a la Margarito, he more than likely would have got caught and possibly knocked out. Jacobs may have been throwing more, but I sure as hell didn't find his punches to be scoring punches or in better words "effective" punches.
     
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    RingKing, Aug 2, 2010
    #13
  14. Tommy O C

    Tommy O C VIVA LA MEXICO!!!! Full Member

    3,647
    0
    Jun 17, 2010
    I had it 3-1 Jacobs.
    First round was close and could have gone either way.
    second round was all Pirog.
    third and fourth were similar. Pirog was pressing the action but he wasnt landing too much. Jacobs was boxing well off the backfoot. I gave both them rounds to Jacobs.
    Every round besides the second could have gone either way though.
     
    Tommy O C, Aug 2, 2010
    Tommy O C, Aug 2, 2010
    #14
  15. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    The punch stats would support what i am saying. Let me also remind you that when u are ringside scoring a fight as a judge u have limited view is some respects and it is impossible to tell if punches are partially blocked.

    Therefore, you score close rds to the guy putting the work in. Im not sure what rd it was but jacobs threw twice as many as pirog in a rd, but only landed slightly more total punches.
     
    RightCross, Aug 2, 2010
    RightCross, Aug 2, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 4