Should Mosley and Hatton be stripped of their nicknames?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KnockOutArtist, Aug 2, 2010.

  1. KnockOutArtist

    KnockOutArtist Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know that Mosley moved up to face DLH, but I've wondered how he would have done if he had spent time at 140. I think if he had continued his 135 success there, he'd have boosted his legacy greatly.

    You are right there, Mosley and Hatton had a mostly positive impact on boxing as a whole and they should be commended for that. At the same time, I just don't think they'll ever be mentioned or thought of in the same league as their nickname-sharers.
     
  2. Tommy O C

    Tommy O C VIVA LA MEXICO!!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Id be much more worried about "The new Sugar" Ray Robinson than Sugar Shane Mosely.
    Also the chosen one Ronald Hearns. Thats Harry Potters nickname man
     
  3. KnockOutArtist

    KnockOutArtist Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's very true as well. One way I've heard it explained is Robinson being Sugar, Leonard being Sweet 'N Low, and Mosley being Splenda...if that makes sense.

    I hadn't heard about Leonard saying Mosley deserved to be a Sugar, very interesting.
     
  4. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    19,779
    Likes Received:
    704
    :goodNo, it makes perfect sense. After the De La Hoya/Mosley 1 fight SRL was impressed and said Mosley deserved to be a Sugar. Can't find an article on it though I'm still looking...
     
  5. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    19,438
    Likes Received:
    24
    :good
     
  6. RAW

    RAW Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    They are nicknames, that were probably given to them by someone else, so wtf? They've both had legitimate careers although i don't think was anything special.
     
  7. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23

    seriously....

    why is this a big deal to some?

    This is how cults usually start out.
     
  8. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    10,664
    Likes Received:
    6
    Mosley even at lightweight never was as sweet a fighter to have the nickname Sugar. Lightning or Flash would have been more appropriate. Not too concerned with Ricky having the Hitman tag. Although way below Hearns talent wise, he had a style at 140 which did the 'Hitman' moniker justice.
     
  9. Hitman-Fan

    Hitman-Fan Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,431
    Likes Received:
    1
    You're a f*****g idiot

    FAIL :rofl
     
  10. bratwurzt

    bratwurzt Whore Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    1
    No they're nicknames to be precise.
     
  11. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    12,340
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thats just plain silly:good
     
  12. Smackersmith

    Smackersmith Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hattons nickname isn't because of Hearns. In some interview ages ago he was called a little hitman because he was unloading on a heavy bag when he was a kid. How can you strip a nickname? That could be the most absurd thing I have ever read.
     
  13. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,131
    Likes Received:
    2,773
    Mosley too?!, are you serious? :patsch
     
  14. harvinmagler

    harvinmagler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    who the **** even cares
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    42,079
    Likes Received:
    3,670
    I actually don't think Mosley was really any better at 135 than his early days at 147. He was just fighting smaller, lesser opposition but Mosley looked awesome in his days at WW (other than the Rivera bout) up until the Forrest fight. Against Wise, DLH 1, Diaz, Taylor, and Stone, Mosley looked really good, and said he was more comfortable as well since he was a huge LW and must've been struggling to make the weight. De La Hoya was by leaps and bounds the best fighter Mosley had faced up to that point and Mosley looked sensational in that fight.