Pac should test because he has done things in his career that induce speculation of him being on PEDS and has denied random testing. 1. People acting like they can't understand why someone would think pac is on PEDs is just blind. Look at his last 3 years. If you don't understand then you are an idiot. 2. Floyd and his camp were not the first to say pac was on PEDs. The rumour started prior to the cotto fight. 3. If pac wanted 14 days then he should have agreed to it when it was offered the first (and only) time. Oh I forgot, supposedly arum didn't agree and pac said he never heard about the 14 day cut off. 4. Only an idiot would not take that test to prove he is clean when your equal ask for it to have the biggest fight of the era. If pac is clean then he's a dummy. But what can I say, I hardly doubt he makes any real decisions about his boxing career. 5. They even went as far as saying they agreed to all terms without saying or having to say what they agreed to. There was only one demand (OSDT up to 48hours prior to figh) and seeing that they didn't say they agreed to it anywhere must mean that they didn't.
Floyd and his camp were the first ones to claim that Pacquiao was on PEDs, they are the ones who started the rumors. I think this is all fairly complimentary for Pac... These people think he is so good that they can't believe he isn't on PEDs or a cyborg or some other ****... That is a pretty huge compliment...
Being successful doesn't justify accusations. Floyd has done the same in being successful as he's moved up...Leonard, Robinson, Toney, Hearns, Duran.....all have one thing in common above everything eles. They are great! But that doesn't mean they were doping to get to their level. Floyd and his camp were the first to spread those allegations bro. There is NO documentation, articles, blogs or sources that placed this kind of light on Manny unitl FLoyd began making up the rumors. Taking ANY test doesn't prove you are clean....not even the USADA testing that Floyd demanded. And Manny shouldn't HAVE to prove he's innocent based on accusations his opponent started without any proof or eveidence to back up his comments.
This has to be one of the most LAME and utterly stupid threads I've read on ESB... and that's saying something. I read the article and what this has to do with Pacquiao should be beyond anybody that has an ounce of common sense. If any body is remotely close to being relative to this article would be Mosley. An admitted PED user. hmmm I wonder will the Mosley fight in September use the Olmpic style drug testing protocols??? I'm sure GBP when it was wagging it's figurative finger at Pacquiao to take the tests, would apply that same kind of standard to its OWN boxers. And where is the self proclaimed G.O.A.T enjoying the money boxing fans handed over to his pockets. Until Mayweather Jr uses his own money to actually back an initiative in Nevada to actually clean up PED's in boxing, I won't even entertain the bull**** he claims.
Only to the simple minded. I guess the notion of "innocent till proven guilty" is alien to you? You know for a FACT you wouldn't have ever said **** if Sr. Crackhead and crackbaby didn't say **** in the first place. They found a good way to get out of the first fight, and a way to get out of the second...
I have never said that Floyd should drop the test requirements. I HAVE said that the accusations are purely baseless, as they are, but I never said he should drop the requirements... In fact, in the post you quoted, I said Pacquiao should just take the test. What a woeful lack of reading comprehension... I bet all the hostility is due to me outing your lack of anal virginity as well as your fathers tendency to be on the promiscuous side. Seems like a pretty touchy subject... I wonder why?
That sounds good, but the truth is alot of people now think that Pac is on special sauce, wouldnt you wnat to prove that you arent?? Its really simple to do so. What is simple minded is saying that because he never tested dirty that he isnt on the stuff when we have SO ****ing many examples of people that were dirty and admitted to being dirty but never tested dirty. In a court of law your right innocent until proven guilty, but in the court of public opinion its a different burden, its guilty until you prove that your not. That is because we have been burned so many times already with guys being dirty dispite passing tests.