very fair. i disagree with kotelnik deserving the win but ****, it was closer than was portrayed by lederman. i love how a close fight like this with at least 6 tough to score rounds is a robbery. are people looking for a controversy?
Kotelnik, was not busy enough he would land a few good shots but never follow up on anything.Alexander won the power punch stat and was more busier.
Lederman was terrible tonight....Well at least in the Alexander fight. I don't know what the **** he was watching. It was funny when Max kind of called him and Harold got annoyed. I had it 7-5 Kotelnik.
no offense mate, but what's your scorecard? i had rounds 5, 7, 9, 11 for kotelnik with another two rounds that could go either way (including the 12). what's yours?
Ive had these convos many times and find the same common factors. Even though we disagree i still think your a cool dude.
no lie my card was an easy 7rds to 5 in kotelnik...and to be honest alexander aint land but maybe two meaningful ****ing punches the whole fight while kotelnik constantly snapped his head back with jabs,straights rights and some shorts hooks....im a devon fan but lets be honest here kotelnik clearly pulled that fight off
same here:good i mean ****, i've been on your side before and that's why i love boxing: depends on what we judge on
Congratulations on being able to objectively score a fight. I wish there were more like you out there.
look at rounds 5-12 and see who landed the cleaner effective punches...kotelnik easily outlands him almost 3-1 in these rounds
Alexander lost this fight CLEARLY, there was no way they were gonna give the fight to Kotlenik after the dick riding the hbo commentators were doing.
the question is: are you scoring punches that do no damage or just punches that hurt? it's not a dick question but a scoring criteria
especially afters spinks got knocked the **** out,it wouldve been a riot in that mutha if they wouldve gave the decision to kotelnik...