Ring mock 140 test They have Khan the winner out of 8

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by almsn, Aug 9, 2010.


  1. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    No it doesnt, how many Golden Boy fighters have a ring belt? Only one in JMM.
     
  2. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Just the guys opinion, everyone is entitled to their own, not out of the realm of possibility Khan beats Bradley, that everyone now questions the validity of Ring.
     
  3. RichT

    RichT Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    I know this is just fiction for a bit of fun but the bias is unreal. :lol:
     
  4. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    the problem with this is you can become lineal champion and not fight anyone decent for 5 years. you should have to defend the title at least once a year agaisnt someone in the top 10, thats really not asking much.
     
  5. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Its still the "or what?" question though. If a body forces defences then it has to be willing to strip champs and break the lineal titles. The Ring don't want to do this. Either way, that has no effect on whether the Ring and GBP are fixing the ratings or titles, does it?

    BTW in boxing you've ALWAYS been able to become lineal champ and not fight anyone decent for 5 years. Money and/ or public pressure usually help make sure it doesn't happen too often.
     
  6. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    Yeh.....so if you don't fight a top 10 guy each year you get stripped, I don't see why that would be an issue.

    A World Champion can lose their title by;
    a) Losing a title fight
    b) If a Champion consecutively fights 3 non ranked opponents.
    c) Fails to defend there title agaisnt a ranked opponent within a period of 365 days.
    c) Fails to defend the title within 365 days. If stripped for this reason they can regain the title by beating a top 10 fighter within a year of being stripped
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Because they are a magazine Rob, not a sanctioning body. They've probably done it the traditional way because its also the simple and transparent way with very few grey areas (even with it this simple and straightforward we still have the conspiracy theorists).
     
  8. ShaneTheSherrif

    ShaneTheSherrif Active Member Full Member

    803
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I think Bradley would win it. Id fancy Khan to get the better of Alexander though.
     
  9. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    yeh thats fair enough but I don't take there belt seriously because of it.
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Its because the titles are the "man who beat the man" (a boxing fundamental) and they don't strip champions that I DO take the belt seriously.
     
  11. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    yeh i get that but it would be better if you had it as the man who beat the man and continued to beat the best possible contenders?

    the whole point of a lineal title is that its supposed to be how the original world titles were with 1 champion.
     
  12. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    No its not. The lineal title is nothing to do with champions fighting the best challengers and never really has been. Its about winning and losing the title in the ring wherever possible. Fighting the top challengers is to be encouraged but its not a fundamental of how the lineal title works.

    Of course it would be better if the champs consistantly fought the best challengers but if they didn't you'd have to strip them and thats where I have the problem. I'd rather maintain the linearity of the title than strip a fighter. Its a price I'm willing to pay for keeping the titles lineal.

    I'm not claiming the way the Ring do it is perfect but its probably the best, realistic option at the moment.

    If someone comes along with something better then I'll take a look at it. Until then I'm right behind the Ring title.
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    I think people are overreacting as usual regarding Devon. He's not crap all of a sudden. It was an average performance to say the least but I think he's shown he's a decent fighter against Witter and Urango. The problem is as usual people completely overrate and underrate people in equal measure, when he was winning he was better than Bradley now he's put on a bad display he's near bum status. It's ridiculous...

    Khan and Devon are well matched at this stage, I see Bradley to be ahead of them both.
     
  14. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    I know. :lol: What the **** was all that about?
     
  15. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    So if Chad Dawson beats Jean Pascal next week to win the ring belt at light heavy and his next defence is in October 2011 time to Courtney Fry, then 16 months later to Atoli Moore you would have no real issue with that as it stays lineal?

    All you need to do is add mandatories to the ring title for it to become legitimate and taken seriously by ALL boxing fans and media.