IN WHAT ORDER do you rank THE FOLLOWING p4p . . . . . . .

lets look at their resumes popkins


froch
takes dirrels 0
takes pascals 0
defeat jermain taylor in his own backyard
goes life and death with kessler in kesslers back yard (a fight i thought he won)


kessler
beats mundine
ko's beyer
whitewashes andrade
puts up a great showing against the greatest super mid of all time joe calzaghe
loses his title to a disgracefull hometown headbutting performance from ward
becomes a 3 time super mid champion by beating froch


dirrell
loses to froch in one of the most disgraceful cowardly performances ever witnessed in the proffesional game
wins the title by a disqualifcation with great acting skills

 

After this weekend how can anyone in there right mind rate Alexander ahead of Kotelinik?????

 

1) Ward
2) Bradley
3) Dawson
4) Haye
5) Dirrell tied
5) Froch tied
7) Adamek
8) Kessler
9) Alexander
10) Kotelnik

NEVER SEEN Erdie fight.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Froch #1 P4P.....

 

i don't even like froch but you tell me who are the fighters who have a better resume on that list and why?

 

I hate it too but you have to .... the right thing to do is put the person who received the gift ahead of the guy who lost controvesially ... in this case alexander ahead of kotelinik

 

Um he lost to kessler ... so kessler ranks ahead of him .. plus I think they have a pretty even resume mayb kessler has a lil bit better

 

1. Dawson
2. Bradley
3. Ward
4. Adamek
5. Haye
6. Kessler
7. Khan
8. Froch
9. Dirrell
10. Alexander
11. Kotelinik

 

thats fact but i scored it for froch and i think judges were swayed by the bonkers crowd, i think froch came out of that fight with as much credit as kessler even though he officially lost.

 

on what basis would you rank ward and bradley above haye?

 

Haye, Kessler, Adamek. C'mon Froch number 1 in that list, he's not even in the top 3......atsch

 

Conditioning, potential, record, talent and the divisions they are in ... haye is talented and I like him but he's lost before because he gased out .. that's not p4p stuff ... he beats klitz (either 1) or adamek and he makes a case for #1 among this list ... I think he beat who he was supposed to beat

 

I had dirrell ahead over froch .. I think u have to take the official outcome into consideration ... for example let's say fighter A is winning a round comfortably ( not dominating) and fighter B misses a punch and fighter A hits the canvas but the ref rules it a knockdown ... you as a judge have to rule that as a knockdown no matter how u feel about the situation ... I think that same approach should be taken when it comes to rankings