Dirrell was robbed in UK - Kotelnik robbed in USA

Yep, that was the fight I saw. Anyone who thinks that fight was close is INSANE!

Dirrell outclassed Froch and beat him up, he woe AT LEAST 9 rounds of that fight. I don't get the charges of him running when he's constantly hitting Froch & snapping his head back. I can see if he was running and not hitting. The object of the sport is to hit & not get hit. Dirrel outboxed him through the first half og the fight, and when Carl got the kind of wide open fight he was looking for in the late rounds, he got beat up bad, Dirrell had him hurt and retreating in pain at numerous points.

 

So using your god given athletic ability and not stumbling around like a caveman means he fought like a ******? Ducking and dodging punches, using your jab, oh my god he boxed!

I mean we all remember how Sugar Ray made the guy in your avatar quit using similar tactics dont we?

He fought like a boxers supposed to. He could have poured it on earlier, like how he stomped punches into Froch's ass and had his head hitting his heals in the 10th, but he's a young fighter who never went twelve rounds before. Considering he fought an excellent fight. And if the fight hadnt been held in rabbit punch, England he'd have won wide anywhere else in the world.

Uhh no dick head. He was released from the hospital with a concussion. **** you're dumb.

Go watch the 11th round again clown. Abraham hadnt landed a punch up until the point where he had to hit a kid when he was down just to save face from getting used and abused the whole fight.

Froch cant punch. Taylor was gassed. We've seen Froch's "power" when he faces true elites. He's been hurt in his last 2 fights, but Dirrell and Kessler. Yet he hasnt hurt either one. Even got into a brawl with Kessler and still couldnt hurt him.

Froch's power is overrated. He was incredibly lucky to win the championship and hold onto it as long as he did. He's a C level fighter at best. Worse then Gatti level.

 

Boxing News and The Ring both scored for Froch. Hardly a robbery

 

Post your sources homosexual.

 

You quoted the post where he posted his sources?

 

With that small brain of yours you should really be worried considering your fragile glass like British chin.

I asked for sources. Anyone can say a mag said something or another.

 

Dirrell ended up on the wrong side of a tough decision.

Kotelnik got robbed.

the end.

 

But what about euros always supporting other euros theory no matter who they are fighting?? This shouldnt happen really then should it?

 

Bull****. ****ing ITalian judge scored the 11th for Froch. How the **** is that being on the end of a tough decision when the judge takes away your best round?

 

Can you name one title fight in the history of boxing, without injuries, DQ etc., where the winner of the fight fought as bad as Dirrell did? Considering the amount of running, holding and appeals for fouls.

It was a close fight. Neither man deserved to win but only one deserved to lose. If you turn up with as little desire as Dirrell, it's inevitable. You have to show something and Dirrell didn't. Froch won because he tried hard and the fans responded to that.

 

Your saying hes got a small brain after he just pwned you . Then waffle on with a load of rubbish . What a fool.
Many people around the world will have read those magazines and seen their reports.
Accept it Froch beat your hero. The one who falls to the floor when pressured, and paid for it last time

 

Easy David Haye. Dirrell hurt and rocked Carl Froch on multipe occassions. Pulled off some incredible feats of athletism aswell. The only people who thought Dirrell fought a bad fight are usually BRits, most Americans on upon another viewing realize the fight wasnt that bad, atleast on Dirrells end.

Now compare that to David Haye who landed all of 20 punches on a walking stiff to win a paper title from the worst heavywight "champion" in boxing history.

No comparison at all really.


Again if you scored that fight for Froch, you dont know **** about boxing.

 

Exactly you're a lying coward. Atleast Froch is stupid, but has balls. You're just stupid. :yep

 

To be honest I preferred there first fight when Duran battered Sugar Ray over 15 rounds.

And don't even compare Andree Dirrell to Sugar Ray. Different kettle of fish. Sugar Ray knew who couldn't win toe to toe with Duran. Hell who could, that guy was one mean SOB

So Sugar Ray got Duran back into the ring ASAP knowg Duran ballooned in weight after fights and knowing it would take A LOT out of Duran to get back down to weight so quick

And don't even get me started on the fact Ray never gave Duran his rematch

 

You see, proof your just waffling because you have been pwned again and making no real points of note on the subject of boxing. What a fool. Time and time again
What have I lied about? This should be good