Dirrell was robbed in UK - Kotelnik robbed in USA

You've got to remember, this guy doesn't even trust what The Ring says, yet he's happy to take some random bloggers opinion as 100% fact

 

From what I understand it was. Look at some of the moves Dirrell pulled off. Here I'll help you: Watch at 2:45. Almost Whitaker like.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUm8AHqiPKU[/ame]

Now can you show a similar moment of brilliance from Haye against Valuev.

Doesnt matter. I've heard it was horrifyingly boring. Cure for insomnia. Haye became a joke on ESB overnight for that performance. Want me to start a threat asking how boring the fight was?

I've heard he landed all of 20 punches the whole fight.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source...=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=f9519659d5d079d0


Just read the comments and the thread titles. I just googled compubox Haye vs Valuev, and all I got was **** about how some rounds there was single punch thrown. Not single punch connects but THROWN.


And you wanna call this a masterclass? You Brits really have a low standard.

Dirrell was complaining because Froch was blatantly hitting him behind the head. He even body slammed him. Dont know about the UK, but thats illegal in most boxing communities.

 

Froch Got battered in round 12.

You said that Froch outlanded Dirrell in the fight so it's impossible to take your opinion seriously. If he had then there would be a million videos of Froch highlights, but there isn't a single one out there. I mean, cmon. You wouldn't be stuck complaining about clinching and running if Froch had any effective offense in the fight, would you?

 

Froch won round 12? He didnt land a punch in the entirety of the first 2 minutes of the bout. Again this is why I know you clowns cant be taken seriously. DIrrell was flustered surprised he lost, and would admit to anything Grey said.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czg1INSWVuI&feature=related[/ame]

6:30. Please tell me, how Dirrell possibly lost this round. :rofl

 

Its almost amazing how deluded they actually are. Like saying Haye is ducking Klitsckos and fighting Fraudly because he doesnt like the contract. THAT level of delusion.

As I've said, you cant make a Froch highlight of hte fight. It'd include 3 power punches lol.

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578

 

Never said anythign about not believing the ring. What im waiting for is for someone to post it.

You said that Kotelnik beat Alexander correct? the majority of publications including BBC had Alexander the winner. Again dont use that argument if you want the other to suffer.

 

You've just posted the boxing version of wikpedia.

 

Compubox is exclusive to HBO. You've been had.

 

who mentioned compubox? the punch stats are there in black and white.

froch landed 153 of 475. dirrell landed 105 of 315. froch threw more, landed more, pressed the action and made dirrell look like a *****.

there is also the reference to dirrell himself claiming he lost round 12.

 

and what are you? boxings version of confucious :bbb:bbb:bbb:bbb

 

Who did the compubox? Boxrec?

AS for the 12, explain to me, in your own words, how Dirrell lost that round even though he landed more punches?

 

The stats are not attributed to any computerized scoring system so they are meaningless. Somebody on a wiki page made up numbers, get it?

Dude, what satisfaction do you exactly derive from arguing in bad faith? Froch didn't land more blows than Dirrell. Anyone who has watches the fight will see that. If you want to prove otherwise, make a video showing Froch landing 153 punches. The Dirrell video has already been made. Without a visual counterarguement, the truth becomes obvious. You know it and I know it.

 

By the way here's the Dirrell video lufcrazy

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUm8AHqiPKU[/ame]

 

dont say who did it for them, or if they did it themselves. but if the stats arent accurate they would have been changed by now.

round 12, it was close to a degree, just the usual, froch walking dirrell down, out jabbing him(as he did throughout the 2nd half of the fight) and pressing the action. dirrell landed a decent shot that made froch think but that was the only good thing he did all round.

he himself thinks he lost that round, why not argue with him?