IN WHAT ORDER do you rank THE FOLLOWING p4p . . . . . . .

there is no homophobia in my statement. calling 2 proven homosexuals like popkins and dhralf homosexual is not a homophobic statement, it is simply stating irrefutable scientific facts :deal

brutally served 2 delightful platters of self pwnage twice in one night is good going, even for an ignorant fragile homosexual like you popkins :rofl

got to go now popkins, but don't forget tonights score

HEADBANGER 2-0 FRAGILE POPKINS








:hammertime


















































































wha:

 

1.) Dawson
2.) Ward
3.) Haye
4.) Bradley
5.) Dirrel
6.) Kessler
7.) Adamek
8.) Alexander
9.) Froch
10.) Khan
11.) Kotnelik
_____



_____





______

Eredi

 

Headgiver is a funny, funny guy!

 

Dawson
Ward
Adamek
Bradley
Haye
Dirrell
Froch
Kessler
Khan
Kotelnik

 

1. dawson
2. ward
3. bradley
4. dirrell
5. Haye
6. khan
7. alexander
8. kessler
9. froch
10. kotelnik
11. adamek
12. erdei

 

1. Dawson
2. Bradley
3. Adamek
4. Haye
5. Ward
6. Khan
7. Froch
8. Kessler
9. Alexander
10. Dirrell
11. Erdei
12. Kotelnik

 

1.Dawson
2.Haye
3.Bradley
4.Ward
5.Khan
6.Froch
7.Kessler
8.Adamek
9.Dirrell
10.Kotelnik
11.Alexander
12.Erdei

 

Haye hasnt done any thing at Heavyweight to deserve a top 10 ranking, Adamek fough a more dangerous opponent than Haye ever has. Id say both might crack top 20.
Dawson between 3 and 6
Erdei top 50
Khan top 15
Bradley lower top 10
Kotelnkik Top 50
ALexander top 50
Ward lower top 10
Froch top 50
Kessler top 50
Dirrell top 15

 

I take it you rank by H2H potential, and by that I mean potential alone?

How can you otherwise explain that Khan is top 15 when he clearly hasnt done as much as Froch? Beating Taylor and Pascal and then running Kessler and Dirrell very close warrants a much higher ranking than merely top 50.

Froch and Dirrell had quite a close fight, and although I scored it for Dirrell - 35 (!!) places between him and Froch and Kessler?? Sorry, but that doesn't seem logical. I take it you had Direll winning, but since Froch is Dirrell's best win; how can Direll be elevated so high just by beating Froch? Surely his DQ win over AA can't do THAT much for him?

And since Kessler is by far the biggest thing Ward has done in his career - how can there be 40 places between them? Beating a top 50 fighter somehow elevates you into... top 10??

The gap between Khan/Bradley and Kotelnik/Alexander also seems awfully big. Care to explain how there can be 30-35 places of difference? Kotelnik-Alexander was a good fight and they should be ranked higher.

The step from cruiser to heavy is big. I understand that you can have qualms over Haye's decisions, inactivity and duckings -as do I - but being undisputed CW champ and then establish yourself as at least a top 10 contender surely commands respect? The same goes for Adamek.

Please elaborate. I take it it's H2H only, and even then it seems strange due to the enormous gaps between evenly ranked fighters.

 

Problem with Khan is that he's given credit for the Barrera fight when in reality if it were to have been stopped correctly,it should have happened in the second round and declared a no-contest.But even though the cut was basically exactly the same in the 2nd as the last round,the most useless and biased ref on earth in Dave Parriss decided to consult the doctor when the fight was to become official in the said last round.Shame,shame.

 

Are you freakin kidding me?:rofl Ban yourself now!

 

1. Ward
2. Dawson
3. Bradley
4. Dirrell
5. Adamek
6. Kessler
7. Froch
8. Alexander
9. Khan
10. Erdei
11. Kotelnik
12. Haye (or unranked since the way he acts is a disgrace)

 

Simplythebest with a Klitschko's avy....Are you freakin kidding me?:rofl Ban yourself now!