Undefeated Fighters are not True Champions?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Aug 14, 2010.


  1. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    __________________
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    IMO a true champion is one who performs above the rest of the competition.
     
  3. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    "show me a fighter who hasn't lost, and I'll show you a fighter who hasn't fought anybody"

    *shrug*
     
  4. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    I'm surprised you reposted this after the reception you got in the other thread.

    As I said, Rocky Marciano. Explain why he wasn't a 'true' champion.
     
  5. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    makes no sence what so ever a champion is a champion because hes a winner you can have losses but that dosent make you a better champion than an undefeated champion

    this realy is ******ed
     
  6. mughalmirza786

    mughalmirza786 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,774
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    However if you have fought everybody and are still undefeated? Facing adversity doesnt mean you have to lose. Fighting with a broken hand, winning despite being outmatched physically, dealing with bad cuts or other injuries. Those things show championship qualities. Its why, when you see manny pacquiao taking an ass kicking from EM but not having his will broken that you realise he is a true champion.

    Or when you see floyd relying on one hand to get the job done or making adjustments to defeat larger, faster or stronger opponents. An undefeated record is ideal but it doesnt stop someone becoming a great champion.
     
  7. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Probably because I'm not an insecure little bandwagon ***** who views ESB as a popularity contest.
     
  8. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    Okay I can see the point but IMO losing + bouncing back is not a determing factor of a 'true' champion... it could help but isn't that necessary I guess. Wlad KO'd Brewster in a rematch and still not regarded as a true Champion for example...

    B-Hop was considered by many a great champion, and he only avanged 1 loss, which was meaningless against a declining Jones...
     
  9. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Okay. It is a ridiculous statement to make, anyway.
     
  10. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    4,943
    2,116
    Aug 22, 2009
    Are you now going to tell me that Sven Ottke wasnt a true champion ?
     
  11. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
     
  12. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Because a true champion never retires? :?
     
  13. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    What if Lewis had gotten up from those KDs against McCall and Rahman and gone on to beat them? Had he done that, he would've retired undefeated, and by your logic would not have been a true champion. Do you really think this line of reasoning makes sense?
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    What if a fighter's only loss is a DQ loss where they were clearly dominating the fight? Are they true champions?