Amir Khan: "I'm looking at Juan Manuel Marquez, Marcos Rene Maidana or Victor Ortiz"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Aug 13, 2010.


  1. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,378
    704
    Nov 13, 2008
    Too right, if Maidana lands on Bradley or Alexander clean then it's lights out for them also.

    Boxing is about hit and not be hit, more so when you fight a big puncher, make sure you dont get hit clean full on.

    Maidana's chin is not the best, Khan can KO him also.
     
  2. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    he doesnt Willie Limond had him all over the place and even Gomez had him down.

    The point here is that Khan is clearly avoiding anyone with a big punch due to this, light hitters or former featherweights for Khan it seems.
     
  3. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,378
    704
    Nov 13, 2008
    Yet Kotelnik at 140 could not hurt him?

    Does that not tell you something?

    Khan might of been weight drained at 135 being a 5'10 big frame guy like him?
     
  4. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Why bother if the light hitters can knock him out? And why do you care if the light hitters can knock him out?
     
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You weren't watching boxing then. If you were, you'd realize that Norris couldn't fight. I don't even want to talk about who he won and lost to. Norris was a bully, and he got exposed in the end.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Probably because it is a ****en dumb ass question lol...
     
  7. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    These chin checkers are obviously suffering from mental ******ation, why does a glass jaw need to be in with the heaviest punchers of the division to be exposed. It should, like others have stated be exposed against any fighter if it's so poor.
     
  8. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    Khan has always had a weak chin even in the ams:yep
     
  9. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    Because its his mandatory , and hes clearly avoiding him !!!
    Hes clearly only going after real light hitters or former featherweights!

    He wont take a risk , in Khans case a risk is fighting a noted puncher,

    Why do you support this unsportsman like trend ?
     
  10. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    It has been exposed even against fighters levels below him with abysmal KO percentages and this is the reason he avoids punchers at the higher levels in boxing.

    How long do you think he should continue with this path ?
     
  11. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Why hasn't Khan been stripped if he's avoiding is mandatory? Why isn't Maidana enforcing the fight?
     
  12. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Yes I understand this, but I don't understand if Limond was able to put him down, why can't the other light hitters he is facing do the same? Kotelnik, Barrera, Malignaggi hit harder than Limond.
     
  13. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Not really that clear, otherwise he would have been stripped...
     
  14. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    I'd be quite happy if he fought a non-puncher in Bradley in his next fight, but I'd be disappointed if he fought a puncher like Bailey. You?
     
  15. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Of Course Kotelnik couldn't hurt Khan cause Khan was running scared. Rather to throw punches when moving too much.