Bigger effect: Marquez at 144 limit or Margarito at 151 limit?

Not even close dude. I am a Mayweather fan but I am also a fan of many other boxers. That's the difference between me and you. You only like Pacquiao and Filipino boxers or guys trained by Roach. :hi:

I think Margo is a piece of ****. I enjoy watching Pacquiao fight. You guys are meatheads though and the thought of you guys weeping like little girls does make me smile.

 

lol, you nutty!

PWNED!

THIS
Theres at least 3 state commissions which has denied him?

 

I'm pretty sure if Pac wins he won't stay there and take on Williams, Martinez, or anyone else at the weight, so what's the point..

Marg is a good name on his resume, and is also a game big guy who can put on unbelievable pressure against a naturally smaller man. But belts aren't worth **** these days and history will remember this in twenty years... No logic in these two guys fighting for this vacant "belt".

 

It clearly matters or pac would be fighting at 154 and not 151atsch

 

Quite simple really, you said history looked back at SRL with high regard. You chose to speak of his catchweight fight. I said SRL is five times the fighter pac is, so history would look upon him favourably with or without a catchweight fight.

Pac on the other hand is no SRL, he ain't even close. Beating cotto and margarito at a catchweight doesn't even come close my friend, and i'm not even mentioning that both these fights were at a catchweight.

 

Quite simple really, you said history looked back at SRL with high regard. You chose to speak of his catchweight fight. I said SRL is five times the fighter pac is, so history would look upon him favourably with or without a catchweight fight.

Pac on the other hand is no SRL, he ain't even close. Beating cotto and margarito doesn't even come close my friend, and i'm not even mentioning that both these fights were at a catchweight.

 

Yeah, history really reflects poorly on Sugar Ray Leonard for having all those catchweight fights atsch

 

So what you actually mean is that history won't give a **** about a couple of catchweight fights but will consider Pacquio's overall record and resume? Which is ok because history will likely be a tad more objective than you...

 

fail big time

its clear your comparing floyd and manny FOR THE 34333354554 TIME....

STYLES MAKE FIGHTS..

JMM HAS THE STYLE TO GIVE MANNY FITS...SEEN IT IN 2 FIGHTS ALREADY..DONT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT..

FURTHERMORE ALL THIS BEING SAID ABOUT HOW MANNY WOULD WALK THROUGH JMM NOW BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH..
IT WAS ALL SAID BEFORE THE REMATCH TOO...N WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED..

TONY CROSSES HIS FEET AND WAS NEVER TAUGHT HOW TO SLIP A PUNCH OR BLOCK A PUNCH USING HIS GLOVE...

SURE HE'S A BIG WW AND A DECENT SIZED LMW...BUT THIS IS BOXING AND STYLES MAKE FIGHTS...SIZE WILL PLAY A ROLE IN TONY-MANNY...BUT CMON NOW....THE GUY GOT BRUTALLY KNOCKED BY AN "OLD MOSLEY"...

HE COULDNT DEAL WITH SHANES SPEED HOW IS HE GONNA DEAL WITH PACQUIAOS SPEED AS PAC HAS QUICKER HANDS AND FEET THAN SHANE...

MANNY STAYED AWAY FROM JMM IN THIS ONE FOR A REASON...STYLES MAKE FIGHTS...