The evolutionary predecessors of Mike Tyson and how they changed gloved boxing.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Aug 13, 2010.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected



    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  3. The Pup

    The Pup Member Full Member

    246
    2
    Apr 3, 2010
    Nice write up Janitor. I love reading ol fight write ups of Terry, maybe Ive missed the threads but he hardly gets a mention on these boards for some reason. How bad of a fix was his bout with Gans?
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Ther is a fair amount of circumstantial evidence to suggest that the Gans fight was fixed, which is why I did not list it among McGoverns laurels. If on the other hand it was on the level then it might just be the greatest win of all time. McGovern did beat two lightweight champions so he was clearly a force at that weight.
     
  5. Meast

    Meast New Member Full Member

    0
    13
    Dec 6, 2008
    Nice little article janitor
     
  6. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    Very good thread, enjoyed reading it.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Why do our ideas of boxing evolution always centre around the defensive specialists?
     
  8. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    "Outboxing" someone for that same reason is always assumed to be on the outside and going backwards. But James Toney outboxes people standing against them.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Sam Langford anyone?
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Because generally people tend to think 'aggresion' makes a 'brawler' and therefore 'unskilled', but applying pressure is equally as hard as being defensivly sound IMO.

    Do you think he revolutionized offensive boxing?
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Sam Langford undoubtedly influenced later fighters such as Jack Dempsey.

    I dont think that he revolutionised offensive boxing, as took the best of what had gone before, and combined it into something more refined than anybody had seen before .......or since!
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,974
    48,042
    Mar 21, 2007
    Is it not possible that Langford was the first counter-pressure fighter?


    If you don't think so, who would you point to as coming before him and why?
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Mrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    Barbados Joe Walcott perhaps.
     
  14. Duranium

    Duranium Member Full Member

    422
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    he lost like a 3rd of his fights
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    It probably didnt help that he continued figfhting at world level after he was clinicaly blind.

    History shows that fighters who can see generaly enjoy an advantage.