The next time you'll completely dismiss another fighters chances

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Aug 15, 2010.

  1. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    39,748
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yep.

    I'm willing to put a life time avatar bet on, that Pacquiao will fail against Mayweather.
     
  2. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    17,221
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'd feel fairly safe dismissing Cotto's chances should he rematch Pacquaio. So long as Manny doesn't show signs of decline when fighting Margo.
     
  3. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    94,450
    Likes Received:
    29,323
    I can't take JCC jr's chances against Cotto serious for one moment.
    Maybe that's wrong, I don't know but seriously... Chavez jr.????
     
  4. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    5
    Whoever Sugar Niko fights next, I really dont think Pacquiao will beat Mayweather.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,234
    i dismissed dawsons chances, and i was right yey
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    If you have a strong conviction that one guy will win, does that count as "dismissing" the other guy? I suppose I will be guilty of this the next time a big fight swings round then, I rarely sit on the fence. I have a strong conviction that Wladimir Klitschko will beat Sam Peter rather easily, so I guess I am dismissing Peter's chances in that one. I plead guilty.
     
  7. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    I'd consider ''dismissing someone's chances'' as ''refusing to accept a reasonable, balanced, well put argument as to why fighter X can beat fighter Y''.

    Saying ''Sam Peter might beat Wlad because Wlad has a glass chin'' isn't - Wlad has improved a lot since the first fight, Peter hasn't. My take on that one would be that Peter had his golden chance, couldn't take it and lost.
     
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    405
    Sam Peter has a chance at victory if he comes into the ring in relatively good shape and he gives it a determined effort. This is a chance because we've seen Wladimir hurt on multiple occasions, and Peter has proven to possess the punching power to, if not stop the big man, at least hurt him. I'd still be liable to bet the house of Klitschko, and wouldn't have any disagreements with those who were unwilling to entertain the idea of a Miraculous punch landing by Samuel Peter.
     
  9. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    1
    Damn. I expected my comment to be picked up.

    I give Berto no chance against anyone good or anyone who isn't about to retire.

    He got exposed by Quintana who you could almost see needed a walking stick to get to the ring.
     
  10. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    Of course.

    That's a good example of a reasonably put argument, which people are free to agree or disagree with.

    :good