Who is the 3rd Best Heavyweight of All Time???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Aug 14, 2010.


  1. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    I amuses me no end when people insinuate they have a great command of language and then resort to emoticons to express themselves. What you said was (and I quote): "he never fought anyone worth a mention neither (sic)"
    Which is really really stupid and merely goes to show you don't have the slightest idea of what you're talking about.
    Odious little ****.
     
  2. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,481
    96
    Mar 11, 2005
    All are miles above Tyson
     
  3. Secern

    Secern Member Full Member

    182
    0
    Aug 15, 2007
    Lewis, then Holmes, and then Foreman
     
  4. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    This is my Top20. I finally found it.


    1. Muhammad Ali
    2. Joe Louis
    3. Lennox Lewis
    4. Larry Holmes
    5. Jack Johnson
    6. Jack Dempsey
    7. Rocky Marciano
    8. Evander Holyfield
    9. George Foreman
    10. Joe Frazier
    11. Mike Tyson
    12. Wladimir Klitschko
    13. Sonny Liston
    14. Ezzard Charles
    15. James Jeffries
    16. Jersey Joe Walcott
    17. Harry Wills
    18. Riddick Bowe
    19. Max Schmeling
    20. Floyd Patterson
     
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,250
    15,298
    Jun 9, 2007
  6. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    Probably the best list I saw on this forum. :think
     
  7. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Holmes, all day long!
     
  8. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    If that's a list of how great they were in their respective day, it's fine and dandy. If it's a list of how they would do against each other h2h, it's absolute shite.

    re the constant questions about what did Tyson do, what did Liston do... both of them fought better competition than Louis. The fact that Louis is still so popular just shows the power of the wartime propaganda campaign lol... and the aftereffects of the Fight of the Century.

    Liston and Tyson both cleaned out their divisions, absolutely obliterating everyone who stood in their way until they reached the top. Liston would have been champ YEARS earlier if he had been given a shot against Patterson, another very weak HW champ who was doing everything he could to stay out of Sonny's way. Had Ali not come along, Sonny would have been champ for several more years, which is a testament to him considering that he didn't even get the belt until he was well past his best days. It's just his typical bad luck that Ali came along when he did.

    With Tyson, you have to trust your eyes and what you know about him. You saw the ridiculous speed, the ridiculous power, the excellent defensive skills, the quick feet, the fluid combinations, the head movement, the killer instinct. Later on we found out about the chin. Make your own judgement. imo no fighter in the world from any period is a lock to beat a prime young Tyson on any given night, and I can count on one hand the number of fighters I would favor over him. I don't even need my whole hand.

    Foreman used to spar with Sonny and said that Liston was the only fighter who ever turned him into a cute boxer, backing up and moving from side to side trying to get away from Sonny's sledgehammer jab. He had a longer reach than Lennox Lewis and debateably hit harder, with a better chin (up until the 2nd Ali fight).

    Liston was a ****ing monster.
     
  9. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    Foreman would have flattened Holmes, Lewis, and Tyson.
     
  10. sportofkings

    sportofkings Boxing Junkie banned

    12,368
    23
    Jul 21, 2010
    Maybe not though Lennox and Holmes both had the best jabs of all time and superb boxing skills its possible they could outbox foreman on their best nights even though a ko victory is posible for Foreman.The style match up dosent suit well for tyson though.Foreman is the hardest puncher in heavyweight history,he has a great chin and tysons agressive come forward style could play right into foremans hands.
     
  11. Hank

    Hank Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,463
    15
    Dec 30, 2006
    I would have Marciano at top. Tyson, Louis, and Dempsey are 4 top IMO. I notice a lot of Lewis-Holmes-Foreman support, plus ALi. Do some people throw out anyone prior to 1970? Also Klitschkos have never held whole title, just belts.
     
  12. Musashi

    Musashi Member Full Member

    366
    1
    Oct 27, 2006
    1.) Ali
    2.) Louis
    3.) Johnson
    4.) Holmes
    5.) Foreman
    6.) Lewis
    7.) Frazier
    8.) Holyfield
    9.) Marciano
    10.) Liston
     
  13. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    Other than an ageing Jersey Joe Wallcott who did he fight worth a mention?
    Twat... calling people stupid with no intelligent debate to back up your insults. If you're going to slate my boxing knowledge at least try to show some of your own :hey twat
     
  14. Hank

    Hank Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,463
    15
    Dec 30, 2006
    Marciano's generation was more competitive than any that came after till year 1990 when former communist country fighters were allowed to turn pro. There were many more pro fighters active, and boxing was second biggest sport in country behind baseball. It may have been as big as baseball.

    Charles was not old, he was still in prime, just cause he lost to Marciano did not make him old. Walcott was champ, and was still showing no signs of having slowed down.