Proof that Pacquiao's lawsuit vs Mayweather, and associates its some ****.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010.


Page 1 of 11
  1. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009
    Taking some Business Law classes, and came across some Tort laws that apply in the U.S


    If the defamation is made orally, it is slander. In order to recover damages in a case of slander, the plaintiff must prove "special damages": that is, the plaintiff must show specific monetary loss that resulted from the defamatory statements. While libel is contained in a permanent form, slander, by virtue of being spoken, is not. It is the lack of permanence that gives way to the special damages involved with slander. If the people who herd the slander so not act in a way to cause harm to the involved with slandered person, there is no case for compensation, which is one of the main goals of tort laws. One exception to the requirements of special damages occurs if the false statements constitute slander per se.

    Another conditional privilege is the public figure privilege. Public figures are individuals who are in the public eye, typically POLITICIANS and ENTERTAINERS. Because these individuals have a significant impact on our lives, we want to encourage free discussion abut them, so we do not hold people liable for making false statements about them as long as the statements were not made with malice. This privilege does not seem to place an unfair burden on the public figure because such an individual can easily respond publicly to any false claims given that he or she is already in the public eye, and has the appropriate outlets available for giving his or her opinion.



    In short Pac has no case because he's a public figure, he's a politician and an entertainer, the same laws that allow us to call Floyd a flaymo, and Pac a ******* without being sued protects Floyd as well. Pac also has to prove that being called ******* has hurt him financially, since being called a ******* he's inked a deal with Nike, and is on his way to earn his highest paid day ever 25 million for the Margo fight. To be honest he may be bigger right now than ever before.

    I pretty sure Pac got his lawyer on a retainer, that's what athletes, and big starts have set up cause they're constantly being sued anyway, so it's not costing him anymore money to sue Floyd. This Lawsuit is all about ego, and keeping the ball on his court as far as being the victim to casual fans. I'm pretty sure everybody knows its bull****.


    If you know of something different please feel free to share, I might of missed something, this post isn't to attack Pac I just noticed all the people who hope the fight will happen if Floyd gets sued and loses all his money to Pac forcing him to look for a pay day. the other thing my book says is that defamation suits aren't big pay days, so if Floyd was to lose it's not gonna be anywhere close to 7 figures as Pac fans hope for. State your opinion respectively, I don't care who gets sued, and I don't play sides on lawsuits, and none of these rich ****s are paying any of our bills so I'm not biased at all on who sues who.

    If you're looking for a source look it up your damn self "Tort Laws" that is.


    Sorry for any errors
     
    Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010
    Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010
    #1
  2. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    This is exactly what I was saying when the "bogus" lawsuit was announced. Pac has no chance of winning, and he was just filing the lawsuit in order to detract attention away from the growing suspicions over why he didn't want submit to randm drug testing.
     
    boxsensei, Aug 20, 2010
    boxsensei, Aug 20, 2010
    #2
  3. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009


    I guess Paulie knew what he was talking about after all
     
    Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010
    Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010
    #3
  4. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    I'm pretty sure that the Canadian and Philippine law is different from the US so I don't really know, but I don't think that monetary issues are the only issues that can win a case like this. I don't really care who wins this suit; I just want to see the ****ing fight. This argument is very interesting. I'll look up Tort laws later.

    The highlighted statement is really a bad example. No calls Floyd a flaymo but his fans are called *****s and Pacquiao, a ******* but his fans are called that.
     
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    #4
  5. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    More of the same. What Pac presents as "real" is exposed as no more than a publicity stunt:

    -- Accepting the fight
    -- Accepting drug tests
    -- Accepting test cut offs
    -- Accepting previous test terms
    -- Fighting "quality" opponents
    -- Baseless lawsuits

    Pac is constantly exposed. This is more of the same that a handful of posters and myself have been saying all along. Pac is a fraud.
     
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    #5
  6. Samski313

    Samski313 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    The whole lawsuit was a diversion from him not wanting to take random test. He had something to hide and still does!!!! The **** will catch up with him one day just like it did Roger Clemens!!!!!!
     
    Samski313, Aug 20, 2010
    Samski313, Aug 20, 2010
    #6
  7. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    You're a moron. You don't even understand this law suit. Your hero Fraud Gayrunner run away from Manny Pacquiao. Of course Pacquiao fighting quality opponents good quality opponents. Unlike your hero, he bloated a jr. light weight all the way to welter weight, not to mention knew that Mosley would be a over trained because of his preperation for Berto. :patsch
     
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    #7
  8. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Dude, if you have been following the negotiations you'd know that Pacquiao NEVER rejected the blood testing. But then again Floyd Mayweather's vacation is just a diversion until Pacquiao retires or loses. Then he'll come back and fight Ivan Calderon at Jr Middle weight but at catch weight of 150 and will not make it and just pay the fine. Void is Void right?
     
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    Knives7, Aug 20, 2010
    #8
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I don't understand the lawsuit? Please. That lawsuit is crap. Anyone with common sense knows it. Nobody is running from Pac. There is no need to. Threaten to drug test him and he begins to scatter like a roach.

    Pac won't fight anyone unless they have recently lost and/or been knocked out. He prefers knocked out.
     
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    #9
  10. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    28,867
    14,394
    Dec 6, 2008
    OMG!!!!!! USADA!!! TESTS!!! PAC!!! FLOYD!!

    Hahaha, sad.
     
    Babality, Aug 20, 2010
    Babality, Aug 20, 2010
    #10
  11. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    You do know that "blood testing" is short for "random blood testing" right?

    So you are right, Pac agreed to blood testing as long as he had time to prepare for the test. Just like a cheater would want.

    Pac is so scared to fight a REAL fight that he takes on an unlicensed cheater who got knocked out while at the same time forcing him into a catch weight.

    Pac is a fraud.
     
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    bald_head_slick, Aug 20, 2010
    #11
  12. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Haha, he's probably taking classes at the local JC and now he's another ESB Lawyer.
     
    thesmokingm, Aug 20, 2010
    thesmokingm, Aug 20, 2010
    #12
  13. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    All you *****s are just ignorant Black people , so racially bias and blind to logic because of it. You don't think it's wierd that you all share one thing in common (besides your unbending love for Floyd) , you all pretty much have the same color skin. That makes all of your arguments unfounded and inaccurate. You cannot be objective if so blinded by your racial motivations
     
    USboxer1981, Aug 20, 2010
    USboxer1981, Aug 20, 2010
    #13
  14. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos MĪƒderator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    It looks unlikely that Pacquiao has a case, but your own posting leaves open the possibility. You can call him a *******, sure, and you can even go a bit beyond what you can do with someone else as a result of him being a public figure, but if there were some deal that had been called off because of their allegations of doping then there might be grounds for a case.

    I don't know of any deals and I haven't read to see what's been filed, but don't discount it entirely. Just because Nike has invested in Pac doesn't mean that someone else hasn't walked away.
     
    vonBanditos, Aug 20, 2010
    vonBanditos, Aug 20, 2010
    #14
  15. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    LOL too bad we had a ******* who's a real ****ing Lawyer ( actually gets paid as a Lawyer ) but got banned because he puts all these 1 week certified lawyers through google and yahoo search engines to the ****ing **** hole.
     
    Devildoc, Aug 20, 2010
    Devildoc, Aug 20, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 11