Proof that Pacquiao's lawsuit vs Mayweather, and associates its some ****.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010.


  1. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos Mσderator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    There are other lawyers here. Fatcity is one and NeckBreaknAiken finished law school and just took the Bar, I think. I'll be applying to law school in two weeks.
     
  2. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    It doesn't matter what *****s think or pretend to know. What is real is that the federal judge assigned to the case has allowed Pac's lawyers to begin their process of discovery and did not toss the case as GBP tried to file for.
     
  3. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  4. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009


    Good point, I like posters like you who use logic, and not emotions. Need more posters like you!
     
  5. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos Mσderator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    That doesn't mean a whole lot. This is standard stuff - it just means that allegations are enough to proceed to gather evidence. Take a look at SCO vs Novell if you want to see a hilarious case that's lasted 7 years without any evidence whatsoever.

    On its face, Team Pacquiao doesn't look like they have much, but then again I don't know what exactly they have. I wouldn't look to the judge having failed to throw it out this early as a sign of anything, though.
     
  6. Samski313

    Samski313 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    0
    Jan 15, 2010

    He rejected random blood testing and he rejected the 14 day cut off! I followed the negotiations have you? Please tell us why he rejected this offer the first time and give a valid reason.
     
  7. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Most ESB Lawyers expected it to not make it past that point. What's interesting is the judge didn't allow Team Pac to dig into certain GBP boxers' histories with regards to their own drug test history. Hmm... What's GBP hiding?
     
  8. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009
    Again the race thing I guess all the Mexicans who log Chavez, and believe he won every fight, and all the filippinos who believe PAC can do no wrong are racist also?
     
  9. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos Mσderator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Practically all of the talk on this forum is emotional. In that same vein, most of what appears to be boxing news is really PR/marketing. Nobody actually went to see what the law involved. And going into any GBP drug history would appear to be a fish expedition and not at all relevant to the case.
     
  10. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    GBP have at least one guy whose a known cheater and it shows that they are not on the level when it comes to backing this whole outside drug testing deal. I don't know if you knew this, but GBP declined a fight with Judah vs Mosley because Judah asked for blood tests since you know, Mosley cheated vs ODH. Anyone can see the contradiction there.
     
  11. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    ESB has it's own lawyers now.
     
  12. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    :rofl:rofl

    Pacqiuao agreed to random blood testing as long as NSAC ask for it. Mayweather wanted a 3rd party to do the testing therefore Pacquiao for this:

    This is what he wanted during the FIRST negotiation. He wanted a 30 day cut off date. He will give a blood 3 times and I forgot when he's gonna give the first 2, (it was 30 days before the fight) but he was willing to give blood after the fight. Not random I know. Is it reasonable? Yes because he also offered an unlimited UNLIMITED urine testing for the remaining 30 days before the fight.

    Mayweather disagreed. So Pacquiao just wanted the 30 day cut off date and test during those days will be random and of course there will be unlimited urine testing as well. After the 30 days are over the unlimited UNLIMITED urine testing will still be in effect. DUDE! Urine testing is as reliable as the blood testing. You don't believe it? You have internet use it.

    You don't even have PROOF that Pacquiao is on roids. Your only basis is that Pacquiao is winning.

    And I can't believe you're still defending Mayweather. Seriously, your hero is so ****ing scared, who made a bold statement saying that Pacquiao will be an easy fight , when to a "vacation", but we all know this is just to buy time until Pacquiao retires and loses.
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    whatever bottom line is that if the lawsuit is full of **** then it should have no impact on Pac vs Mayweather negotiations.
     
  14. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Do you always have to bring race into every thread you enter? Pathetic.:-(
     
  15. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009

    He rejected the 14 cut off date not the testing. There's a difference. A BIG DIFFERENCE. :patsch A valid reason? Pacquiao asked for a 30 - 24 cut off date right?? While Mayweather wanted 0 -7 -14 days. In those 30 -24 cut off that Pacquiao requested; there will be an UNLIMITED UNLIMITED urine testing. They can test Pacquiao everyday for all he cares. He was even willing to give blood after the fight.

    I'm amaze how you can still support a guy who accused someone of using PEDs without a valid proof. He also stated that he can beat him easily, but decided to duck him and go on a vacation.