Proof that Pacquiao's lawsuit vs Mayweather, and associates its some ****.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, Aug 20, 2010.


  1. cainne

    cainne Noli Mi Tangere Full Member

    436
    0
    Jul 9, 2010

    the only thing that fits the word hiding here is your gayduckboyfriend..:lol:

    now,go find him and tell him to sign the goddam contract.
     
  2. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    :rofl:rofl

    Anyone with a mental illness will believe every word the Mayweather say. When exactly did Pacquiao scatter? I can tell you one thing though Mayweather is scared of Pacquiao so scared he can't even mention his name.

    Floyd won't fight anyone who isn't bloated or overtrained/old. Oh wait, he prefers beating up women. Now that Manny is willing to fight him he ducks. Before he wanted Manny to call him out, Manny did, Floyd and Sr. said PEDs A-side-meth. :rofl

    You're a ****ing hypocrite. You just said in a previous thread that the cancer of boxing is those fans that count out boxers who loses and now you're implying that just because a boxer lost his previous fight means that he'll lose his next one.

    Face it you're hero is so afraid of Pacquiao and his vacation is just to buy time until Pacquiao retires or until Pacquiao loses. How can you defend this guy? You accused Pacquiao of having no honor but Mayweather couldn't even honor his agreement with Marquez. The man is rude and always contradicting himself. I don't understand your logic at all.
    Your hero QUACKED!
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSMH1ytU1Oc[/ame]
     
  3. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    I'm not even black but that was uncalled for man. I know there are illiterate *******s that accused of all Pac fans as Filipinos or Asians but they probably didn't get proper education so there is no reason to stoop to their level.
     
  4. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    He ran from Mayweather's 14 day offer (which he wants us to believe he's happy to accept now) to fight Clottey.
     
  5. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Pacquiao was pressing for 24 cut off date. Pacquiao wanted to fight on March 13th couldn't fight after that date because of the election in the Philippines. **** I really wish he lost that ****ing election. They were on DEAD LOCK because either one won't budge. He had to make a decision because he couldn't wait for Mayweather. But that's in the pass now. Right?

    The Mayweather fans are asking the Pacquiao fans why 14 days weren't good before and now it's good. I've explained it in my previous post. I'm asking you not as Pacquiao fan but boxing fan, why is the 14 days not good now but it was good before?
     
  6. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    5
    Dec 26, 2009
    Pacquiao doesn't have legs for this lawsuit, how is he going to prove that he has damages to his reputation? He was elected to the Philippine congress and he sold 700K PPV in his last fight, other than his Oscar and Cotto fights, that was his best of his career. So he incurred zero damages from the "accusations".
     
  7. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    28,862
    14,378
    Dec 6, 2008
    Lol Floyd is a dumb ass.

    Question - "You make it rain in the club with fake money, true or false".

    Floyd - "Errbody is entitled to thur own uhpinion". :rofl
     
  8. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    This is exactly why I can't support Floyd. He's so pathetic.
     
  9. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Well its pretty much the same as the O.J. trial and acquittal. Black people were celebrating at not guilty while Whites, Asians, Hispanics, Natives were asking WTF?? Its just the way it is. They're a tight bunch.
     
  10. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Your a moron no matter what topic you decide to post on.
     
  11. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009

    You're a ****ing moron.
     
  12. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Not as dumb as you. You can`t even argue properly! You`re obviously a *****. All your posts makes you sound illiterate. Don`t post at all if you have no argument. ****ing ******.
     
  13. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009


    urine is not blood

    blood is not urine

    30 day cut-off is not random up to the fight

    24 is not random up to the fight

    heck, 14 is not random up to the fight, but it was a compromise

    also, if someone refuses to take proper testing you can't prove he is on anything

    i could be high as a kite right now, but since i didn't take any tests, you can't prove it
     
  14. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    Ok with that being said, you just made a statement that whatever NSAC and the rest of the boxing governing bodies do when it comes to protecting the fighters from cheaters is a complete joke. That also includes Mayweather with suspicions of using illegal drugs that cannot be detected by standard procedures that's being implemented by the governing bodies.

    Cliffs: FLoyd could be using drugs for a very long time since he's shown greatness since he was a featherweight.
     
  15. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    If today is the 1980s or 1990s. I'll definitely agree that urine testing is not enough to test someone for drug use.

    You don't get it do you. Those days are just cut-off dates. They just stop blood testing. I repeat during that period boxers cannot be blood tested, but once again during that period the commission that will test them can still use their urine.

    Usually most fighters start 2 months to train for a fight. Let's say that they've agreed on the 14 days cut off date. There will 6 weeks to test both boxers. During that period the test(s) WILL BE RANDOM. Both boxers will not know WHEN they will be tested during that 6 weeks period. That makes it RANDOM. Setting the date of when the they will be tested is NOT random. Get it now?