Adamek vs Grant - Round by Round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Loufatski, Aug 21, 2010.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,233
    78,525
    Nov 30, 2006
    It sounds like not buying this was a wise investment choice.
     
  2. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    I was there live and thought it was worth it, even beyond the atmosphere. None of the fights were spectacular, but the two main events were both pretty decent fights. Adamek-Grant was much better than it had any right to be.
     
  3. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I noticed the auditorium was pretty full during the under card. A lot of times people only show up for the main event.
     
  4. JustinD

    JustinD Member Full Member

    453
    0
    Mar 21, 2007
    Your sthick is getting old *******, come up with a new gimmick.
     
  5. funkykoval

    funkykoval Active Member Full Member

    1,000
    49
    Jan 20, 2008
    adamek didnt look impressive against grant

    but as far as I remember Haye was running out of valuew?

    adamek actually tried to fight, not only running, comming in, land a single punch then runaway

    adamek tried to land punches and combinations so dont be so sure
     
  6. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    He was moving forward to beat the bigger guy :good You must be very self-confident to put such a pressure on the giant. Yet, there is a space to improve his boxing.
     
  7. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    He had a shutout but at the same time he says Adamek cannot beat any of the Russians.
     
  8. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    They were watching the fight.

    Professional boxing is scored as follows:

    • Clean Punching
    • Effective Aggression
    • Ring Generalship
    • Defense
     
  9. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    I just watched the fight online (tho was a little distracted) and no that fight was close. grant landed the more effective shots and had him stunned several times in that fight. Plus Adamek wasn't doing effective aggreesion either b/c he was backpedaling, circling, then jumping in and often tiems getting countered. You Adamek fans are in denial if you don't thnk the fight was close
     
  10. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    Pro Boxing is not scored on effective shots, but clean shots.
     
  11. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Either way, fight was at least close. And all pro fight scoring at least considers effectiveness. How else would Hopkins-cal been an SD? Joe must've outlanded him 3:1.
     
  12. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    Effective aggression, as in not just showing aggression but showing it effectively.
     
  13. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    I know what effective aggressiveness means. Talking about punches and I'm telling you they consider the effectiveness of the punches too whether it's specifically cited in rules or not. And even if in this fight you were only factoring "clean punches" the fight was still close
     
  14. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    Adamek dominated in all 4 departments... clean punching, effective aggression, ring generalship and defense.

    Therefore, the fight was not very close.
     
  15. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    391
    Jun 14, 2006
    Good because Grant was the equivalent of C- level last night.