List the fighters that Pacquiao wouldv'e fought...If he wasn't a "TOP-RANK" Fighter.

Sometimes its a matter of asking yourself...**** this guy's agenda...I'll just answer the question...if this turns into something else. I'll stop now.

I'm not sure why that's so hard...

I've literally stopped visiting this site because it's the same bull**** everytime. Constant bickering between bias this and racist that. Who cares? If there's an opportunity to POSSIBLY have an interesting dialogue then so be it and take it.

Whatever **** this...I've done my part.

 

As is you're tired tirade of internet mud slinging...you gonna answer this dude's question...or are you still obsessed with his agenda?

 

all you need to do is sort out the online personas....it isn't that hard

 

I would be down with that if it was an interesting question. He was basically looking to tear down Manny's record, dressing it up with the suggestion he could have fought a list of spurious names.

 

There's was clearly 2 other posters who have answered the question legitimately without getting all pissy about agendas and he responded without attacking or really arguing.

Ant was one of them
Me the other
And there was some other guy...WHO WAS A PACFAN

Seriously...just answer it. You MIGHT be surprised:shock:

 

I just think it's time for people to relinquish their fanboyism. I'm looking forward to the day when Manny and Floyd are both gone (especially Floyd though), then maybe people will start appreciating the sport again.

 

Mosley goes to a vacation instead of fighting fraud and its called ducking by the *****s posting videos of that in every single thread pointing at the blatant duck by Mosley,Fraud does the same to Pac and its not ducking is just "floyd being floyd",how about these double standards Darryl?why didnt you start one thread about it with your usual DS routine?

 

some people who affiliate themselves to boxing do it because it's a 'fake release' from who they were when they were young. it lets them live through their heroes without facing their own fears so, trust me, they will latch onto someone else.

 

You see it that way because you want to. Yea...it could very well be a dressed up agenda but who cares? It's still an interesting question because it's pointed towards ARUM!...BOB ****ING ARUM...not Pacquiao...but BOB ARUM!

I mean...let's be real here. Arum has shielded all his cash cows from certain types of fighters or have fed them a certain style.

I mean ****...I'll do Cotto just so it's not like I give a **** if people discredit the man or not.

Cotto could've fought Floyd @ 140, Hatton, Holt, KT, and maybe Bradley or Wittor

Cotto could've fought PDub @ 147, Cintron, Berto or even Baldomir...but I think he's fought all there truly was to fight in both divisions (excluding Hatton and Floyd @ 140)

Just answer it.

 

spot on,people wouldnt have a problem answering the thread question had it not been asked by a guy that is known here for his tiresome pro fraud agenda and a guy that isnt looking for honest answers but looking for a way to diminish Pac and make fraud look good.

 

cotto's an introvert.
he doesn't smack talk and call out people. he lets his promoter sort fights out.

 

See I don't always see it that way. Promoters want us to blame them as opposed to the fighter. Look at the JuanMa situation; Arum's quite happy for us to blame him so people still think his boy's a warrior. To me, the fighter can demand the fights if he wants them.

 

Well said. Same here. I'm looking forward to the NEW rising stars of the sport of the upcoming boxing generation.

You'll never avoid fanboyism due to boxing's innate ability to draw forth a story of a man and his unrelenting will to win...its because of this that stops it from being a sport and turns into live unscripted theater. And I love it for this reason.

 

Yes, but Floyd and Manny have polarised "fans" who I'm not convinced would be watching the sport without them in it. I could only ever be accused of being a fanboy of Hopkins because, as you say, he has a great story. But I'm even over that now, he really should have fought Adamek at cruiser - he failed to capitalise on his great win over Pavlik.

 

Touche. I think Juanma is a bit of a hyperbolic example...but if you look into Arum in general with the rest of his cash cows...he's done a fair job at hiding his fighters from danger. But I can definitely see your point. I can't help but think had Caballero been the bigger star and the true money horse, would he really be willing to go out after Juanma if there were other fights to settle out...like Marquez and John and Gamboa