pick 'n impartial poster 2 decide mythical matchup winners

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Aug 21, 2010.


  1. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    31
    Jan 4, 2009
    Teeto & itrymariti have a vocational love of the sport & you don't:deal

    You somehow think you're being smart by behaving in a continued & disruptive manner in the immature belief that this is what it takes for you to get the cred you desperatly crave to make up for your obvious failings in all manner of debate of matters boxing all due too a desperate lack of life experience & knowlage of the sport at all levels hence the pathetic "aka's" you persist with. You are a 100% nothing, but if you are to become a something then keep your spasticated gob shut & start paying homage to your fistic overlords on here as it's your only hope of salvation before you begin to self-harm yourself & we would'nt want that would we:hey:lol:
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    ^^ Lyrical assassination
     
  3. Duranium

    Duranium Member Full Member

    422
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    :think...i wish i was cool on the internet
     
  4. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    It's ok, you were cool once:

    This content is protected
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    I wish i had a chip on my shoulder and was only hard enough to vent my frustration on the internet
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,921
    45,761
    Mar 21, 2007
    I love that a thread dedicated to the recruitment of level-headed unbiased posters has descended into total handbags :lol:
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,921
    45,761
    Mar 21, 2007
    What would Hiroshi Kobayashi say?

    This content is protected
     
  8. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    31
    Jan 4, 2009
    John, this would have to be balanced out at bit as in 3/5 judges which would have to include some older cooler heads to temper a tad youth's confrontational enthusiasum. I'd go for 2 yanks, 2 Brits & 1 Aussie, no insult meant to any continental eurotrash by the way.

    There's plenty on here that we could rotate. But 5 would be the optimum.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    funniest post ever
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,921
    45,761
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,443
    41,481
    Apr 27, 2005

    Mate i haven't got a wide enough knowledge of enough fighters and era's and have one or two or three fighters i wouldn't conform with :lol:


    The first criteria given the general nature and lean of the forum is finding people that are fair to the present and recent fighter. This is why yourself, Mac and Stoney came instantly to mind among other things.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,443
    41,481
    Apr 27, 2005
    Didn't you score Duran over Hagler?

    :lol:
     
  13. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    Plenty of people scored that fight for Duran. Those other two statements on the other hand...

    Irrelevant anyway; no-one's putting me forward as a judge.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,443
    41,481
    Apr 27, 2005
    Plenty of people? I've seen two in my entire life, you being one of them and the other a totally rabid Duran fan.

    Just sayin' :D
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008