1.jmm longevity unparreled 2.mab versatility puts him above3. eric morales 4castillo5.corrales quite a few notches below first 3
morales defeated pacquiao. JMM's fight against pacquiao were close fights and could have gone either way. and more importantly Barrera > Castillo :deal
Fail. Marco Antonio Barrera turned professional in 1989. Marquez turned professional in 1993. Marco was fighting top quality opposition since 1996 whereas Marquez didn't really start until 2003. :good
Castillo, MAB, Morales, and JMM were all great fighters and can be interchangable IMO. Say hi to your mom for me.
marquez still fighting at high level win is mab last faught at high level both are great fighters no argument
Morales MAB JMM Castillo Corrales Morales beating 2 of MAB's conquerors puts him above MAB IMO, shows he is more adaptable. Their fights between each other, specially in their prime weights shows they're practically even.
His reasoning consists of rating them higher than Barrera because Marquez lost a close decision to Pacquiao, and Castillo lost a close decision to Mayweather. :huh This is hard to digest.
Indeed. Do the math. No superior longevity on Marquez's part at all. What's your basis for having Marquez at the top...maybe it's your fickle nature?
no its my opinion an his longevity is current an still stong at latter part of career an by the way they are both 36
Well Marco was fighting professionally since the age of 15. :huh Of course Marquez is still going on, Barrera burned out faster not ONLY because he was fighting better opposition for the majority of their primes, but because when he was making 9 title defenses in the space of a year and a half, Marquez was fighting the likes of Julian Wheeler.