EAST SIDE BOXING P4P Rankings: VOTEING CLOSED RESULTS TODAY AT 12pm

1. Pacquiao
2. Williams
3. Bute
4. Marquez
5. Donaire
6. Cotto
7. Caballero
8. Klitschko
9. Montiel
10. Gamboa

 

this :good

 

1. Pacquiao
2. Mayweather
3. JM Marquez
4. S Martinez
5. P Williams
6. M Cotto
7. T Bradley
8. Y Gamboa
9. N Donaire
10. David Haye

 

1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Bernard Hopkins
3. Paul Williams
4. Shane mosley
5. Timothy Bradley
6. Andre ward
7. Jean Pascal
8. Devon alexander
9. Andre dirrell
10. Chad dawson

oh and in case any one ask, i'll put pac back on the rankings once he is cleared of any suspicions by doing the honorable thing to take the test

 

i shouldn't put floyd as well coz right now he's on vacation. we don'tr know when he's going to come back. or maybe he'll retire for good.

 

he is on vacation :rofl

 

1-Pac
2-PBF
3-Wlad
4-JM Marquez
5-Martinez
6-P.Williams
7-Mosley
8-Caballero
9-Bute
10-Pascal

 

being on vacation is different, he recently fought months ago so that doesn't count but you can only remove him if he doesn't fight next year confirming your assumptions. And btw, floyd put shane "you're too good" mosley on vacation but i still rank him as their is no shame losing to the best fighter in the world:good

 

floyd's vacation = ducking :deal

 

i thought someone might ask that; i guess because donnaire has gone way off the boil since KOing vic (whereas vic has stayed relatively active and won some good fights). i also think vic has better resume than donnaire. plus he's going after Mares next so he's still in the mix at bantamweight. regarding Agbeko, yeah he beat vic but lost his next fight and hasn't done much of note since. i guess that's why i'd have vic in there instead of those two.....

 

No way does #4 and #6 deserve to be on any P4P lists - and definately not ahead of Ward and Martinez...

 

Vitali maybe not but Wlad?

Most of the today's P4P lists list Wlad in their top ten, from yahoo to the Ring, to most of ESB (he's number 5 overall according to the tally of votes so far), some has him no. 3.

And why not? If you consider dominance in your division for a long period of time to be a criteria for P4P, then he's deserving as any. Certainly more deserving than others in the P4P lists.

 

Well, the vote is not yet over, so I'll just bring this up on front.

 

TS: The results, pls.