While I agree with your propaganda in favor of Pacquiao, this is a laughable statement. What Cotto took from Mosley was far closer to 'worst' on any scale than 'best.' Mosley arm punched, hail maryied, and pawed his way underwhelmingly in that match.
I wouldn;t say that. Mosley hit Cotto with some bombs. The same type of shot that he hit Floyd with. I still think Mosley is a bigger puncher though. He's a big guy at the weight.
There were a few decent hits here and there, but bombs? Nah. Nothing really cherry. There would have been no mistaking a clean, properly delivered monster shot from Shane Mosley on Miguel Cotto. You've got a bad formula.
mannys speed makes him hit harder.. his punches come so fast.. but pure strength and punching power its hard to go with him over mosley... after pacman margarito we can ask marg who hits harder
Shane's the biggest puncher at 147. Now that doesn't mean Pacquiao can't knock Mayweather out. Pacquiao has the speed and the power. He seems to clip people when they aren't expecting it with compact punching whereas Shane throws looping punches
paquiao is sloppier than shane . he throws pucnhes from his ass and since his opponents dnt see them coming since they are from unorthodox angles they are usually surprised and ko'd and it doesnt hurt that they are coming fkn fast and hard.. pacman is dangerous because of his weird angels but id still choose shane over him any day.. there is a reason why pacman or his camp wanted no part of shane
Your judgement above is based on what exactly? Because Mosley performed poorly in a fight against a common opponent , my statement is then laughable? Also the three types of punches thrown you mention above are seriously questionable considered Mosleys technical ablilities.
Not really defending , just asking you a simple question , which looked too difficult for you to answer. Never mind Peace.