Win you rate higher.....Morales over Pacquiao or Barrera over Hamed?

You ***s get back on the subject at hand.

Or was my thread question obvious to begin with?

 

You may know a lot about Boxing, and Boggle about movies, but I'm the official authority on Winona Ryder. Not only on this board, any board.

(Addie thinks your Boggle, VecArrow, and Swarmer. Fact.)

 

Yeah, we all know that. We were tipped off when you commissioned a ****ing oil painting of her, you sick ****. Fair enough though, Addie. Everyone's gotta have their row to hoe.

I'm insulted you think I'm a creation of Boxed. Clearly we have different voices. Clearly I'm the film expert. You son of a *****.

Oh, and Morales over Pac is a better win. It's obvious that Hamed had more talent than drive. He could've won against Barrera if he wasn't such a cocky ****head. Barrera wanted the win more than Hamed did. Is that good enough?

 

Fair enough.

 

The excuses I hear for Hamed losing in the fashion he did to Barrera are usually the same.

Some claim it was a result of the infallible Mr. Ingle not being present. He would usually stand outside the ring, waving his pom poms, and this would will his man to victory. This was how Hamed overcome such All-Time Greats as Kevin Kelley and Bill Hardy. Keep in mind, however, Hamed had looked awful against Kelley, being knocked down multiple times and made to look ordinary. Ingle was present. He was in the corner. Cheering.

Naseem Hamed was also past prime at the age of 27. It should be completely dismissed that arguably his career best win came only a year prior to fighting Marco Antonio Barrera, in which he stopped Bungu in brutal fashion. This was also without Mr Ingle, and with the aid of Emmanuel Stewart and Oscar Saurez. It's confusing. I thought Mr Ingle was the source for all of Hamed's strengths. :think Interesting too that Hamed would go from being a monster in 2000 against Bungu to a washed up has-been 12 months later in his biggest ever fight against the best opponent of his career.

I suppose I'm willing to accept that Hamed was unmotivated, but is the man just stupid? He's going into the biggest fight of his career against the best opponent he's ever fought, and he's not motivated? Something is wrong with that picture. How did these people come to the conclusion he wasn't motivated? Was it the lack of combination's and his lackadaisical performance? Hamed was not the elusive master that some would have you believe, he was getting tagged on a regular basis as early as 1997. He seldom threw combination's during his peak.

Here's a thought. Hamed came up short against a better fighter than him. Shock, horror.

 

Good post.

Your signature is over the top.

 

I knew you were going to get Addie going with that, Boggle. I actually ducked, awaiting his response.

Edit: Oh, snap! I just read your reply.

 

It's a direct quote from one of her co-stars. :huh I don't make this up.

 

Yeah, it doesn't matter.

Don't pretend like this is normal, Addie. We've all seen the painting, man. Sheesh. atsch

 

A quote is one of the best ways to truly gauge how great someone is.

This content is protected

 

I personally thought it was disrespectful that a fistful of ****s would go in there and comment on how weird it was rather than actually congratulate Jetski on his accomplishment. It's a beautiful painting, and he should be commended for his efforts.

As far as whether or not I should feel guilty for having an original oil painting of my favorite actress, I suppose that's up for debate. I don't see anything wrong with it. :verysad

 

Most destructive body puncher since Julio Cesar Chavez.

 

Yeah, it would've been disrespectful if the general tenor of all the comments WASN'T EXACTLY THIS:

"Great work, JETSKI! Jesus Christ, Addie..."

Don't feel bad though, man. It's part of you, we accept that.

 

Yes. It was. Anyway, Winona paintings are great and so is Valuev and Boggle and myself and Addie.

 

Don't forget about VecArrow & Swarmer.