Are Pacquiao's accomplishments @ 147 really "that much" better than pbf's?

This is the pacland response to any argument.

Put a poll up, on a site that (sadly) too many moron Paclanders have found, and then think it's some amazing fact that obsessed pacquiao fans have clicked "Pacquiao".

It's sort of like an argument on "who is the better musician - Beethoven or Nick From the Beacksteet boys?"

And solving it by putting up a poll, on the noticeboard, in the hall, of an all girls middle-school.

Pacland needs constant reassurance from eachother.

Why? They know full well most educated fans consider Mayweather the superior fighter

 

rather than bash on paclanders, why not put your points on why floyd over mosley is better than pac over cotto? you joyboys are such crybabies.

 

i'm waiting for your top 5 welter when pac fought clottey mrwonderful.

 

:good Very good post... it's hard to answer to cold hard facts

 

I do believe if you read through his posts he has already gave his opinion as to why the Mosley fight was a better win... as have many others and for what it's worth i think beating the guy that just became No1 in the division by smashing the guy that smashed Cotto (even when Margo had loaded gloves) is the better win... and there was no catchweight involved

 

pac-cotto was almost 50-50 while floyd-mosley was 4 is to 1. pac had beaten cotto who performed better than the mosley who fought floyd. grading their effort, pac won over a much better and game cotto than floyd over mosley who losed steam in just 3 rounds.

and for the thread, pac had beaten an elite welter in cotto in less than two year at the weight, his second fight while floyd took on a same caliber in mosley only on his 5th year at the weight.

 

Mayweather odds are always high that because he is just that good, no one expects him to lose, he will never be the underdog.

As for pac, people know he been knocked out, can be out boxed so they know if he got his ass kicked it no big deal or shock.

 

it's not only that. people knew that mosley has been inactive. if floyd fought the same mosley just right after the margo victoy, odds would be somewhat closer. meanwhile, cotto was the first real test for pacquiao at the weight and he stopped him.

 

Yes, they are. Next question.

 

You failed the test already.

 

floyd

mosley - p4p#3 and the #1 best welterweight in the world
baldomir - lineal champ and the man at 147 the time floyd fought him
judah - former lineal champ and former elite fighter who was a top 5 WW

oh and u forgot guys like

hatton - undefeated p4p figher and imo the top LWW of the era 00-09
marquez - p4p#2 and only floyd defeat him "convincingly"

and now lets go to pac

cotto - solid fighter and a good win but he was already damaged goods, oh plus he was drained
oldh - shot to pieces+drained, corpse of a former great, not the same after floyd destroyed him
clottey - good win but the PEDs allegation and no testing made it suspicious plus a lot of people were saying he was paid off by arum( i don't believe that though but you could say the win was tainted in the eyes of some boxing fans)

 

under what rule is this? :huh
pls elighten us.

 

Yes, mostly because of cotto and the fact that he started his career at ****ing FW.

 

Don't **** with crax, son.

 

Cotto performed better than Mosley... based on what? (other than your biased ******* view?)
I'm a big Pacman fan but not a ******* and guys like you give Pacqiaou fans a bad name