Are Pacquiao's accomplishments @ 147 really "that much" better than pbf's?

The only test I've ever failed was for chlamydia after ravaging your mother.

 

That the best you got? :dead

 

No. I also got hepatitis.

 

like a wildebeast?

 

cotto arguably had at least 2 rounds from pacquiao. he continued fighting even if he knew he was overmatched by pac's speed and power. meanwhile, mosley aside from that 2nd round, has nothing to show but freeze on his shots and gassed-out.

 

More like a rabid proboscis ******.

 

nonsense:deal

 

cotto already beat mosley..are you dumb?

 

Wasn't you born with that?

 

Bull****.... Mosley lost heart that every time he threw a punch he got countered with spite and was then weary of throwing shots... a good counterpuncher can do that... just look at Pacs punch output when he fought Marquez comapred to his other fights... you can't judge how good Mosley was from how he fought against Mayweather alone because it could be largely down to how Mayweather made him look

 

Then Cotto got beat by Margo and Mosley smashed Margo... what is your point dip****?

 

That's interesting, because Shane said it was because he had a stiff neck. A STIFF NECK. Translation: he's ****ing older than ****.

 

That Cotto is Better than a Younger Mosley?

 

mosley being tentative could be due to floyd's defense but him gassing-out in just 3 rounds without too much work applied could be caused by other factors as well like him being inactive or almost 40 years old. of course credit to floyd for making mosley look bad but it's not all floyd's effort. father time and inactivity is not mosley's friend and it showed in his performance.

meanwhile, we saw cotto still giving his best against pacquiao but was terribly overmatched in speed, power and technique.

rating the opponents performance would also tell us which between the two victories is better.