I wasn't talking about Wlad's resume at all. I just commented on Tyson's resume after someone else did. I guess you need to "keep up." But you've been on here for a long time with this stuff, haven't you? We've met up before.
no because HOLY BEAT TYSON!! how exactly am i contradicting myself!?!? it's been posited that Tysons win over spinks was a win over top drawer opposition. i'm pointing out the flaw in that. how many fights did spinks have at hw??
nobody was talking about tyson or anything else besides the topic at hand until this clown showed up, wrong yet again.
To the Klitschko-hater, everything somehow relates back to the K-Bros. They are far more obsessed than the biggest K-Bros fanboy.
Even if one thinks Wlad has a weak resume, how does that equate to Tyson having a strong resume? Answer: it doesn't.
lol you just did it yet again right here, now you consider holyfield great for beating a man you view as second rate or overrated. do you need a dictionary? or should you just repeat middle school again? by saying nothing more than spinks was a "blown up lhw", thats not exactly pointing out a flaw, its just a lazy half assed assessment. did it really matter? he was the first man to beat larry holmes and was able to trade shots with heavy handed gerry cooney, what more proof do you need that he was a legit HW despite of the fact his campaign at that weight class was short lived??
Exactly. For instance Rocky Marciano was great FOR HIS DAY but I can't really see him fighting that same style against larger, more powerful Heavys like Lennox Lewis or Wladimir Klitschko. Both LL & WK can match or best Marciano's power and both have great jabs to help get that power on target.
uummm, no. somebody brought up tysons resume and is comparing it to the likes of wlads, im just responding to it. seriously man how stupid are you? its in the thread, stop being a lazy *******.
It's not just boxing....people do that with all aspects of life. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...t-is-both-better-and-less-intense-the-present