Don't moan, just don't pay the one who disappointed you. I guess this is how the market economy works.
Your orignal argument, if you can call it that, is idiotic, which is why people naturally assume that you have a hidden agenda. Watch the fight again, friend. It was Peter who was warned on three separate occasions for holding, not Wlad. So, you argument is dog****. Comprende?
Fair enough. If Wlad would unleash more hooks to the body while employing this tactic, his opponents wouldn't have the strength or endurance to make it past the 5th. Though I do wonder if this is his version of going to the body to weaken his opponent.
Like it or not - Wlad 2010 would pose one hell of a threat to every heavyweight ever lived - even to a prime Ali, Foreman, Tyson, Lewis. He's fast, heavy handed, very athletic, very intelligent, has a great coach and always the right game plan. All this combined with his size and reach makes him almost unstoppable.
its a shame that the heavyweight fight that would be draw the most interest, will never happen, which would be v kiltschko vs w. klitschko
ohhhhh ahahaha your gonna come at me personally huh big boy? lmao. Dont call me friend because I wouldn't want to associate myself with you. And yeah.. and wlad was never warned once.. it was in germany. ref was paid more to side with wladimir. if you dont agree with it kiss my ass thats my opinion
I agree and think he would KO prime Tyson 10th round ala Buster Douglas. Close decision win/loss verse Foreman. He would go the distance and lose with Ali and Lewis, possibly getting stopped late.
Oh of course, I've never paid to see Wlad fight. If I did I would've been dissapointed everytime. I understand your point completely... but I still disagree, and I don't think that means I'm talkin **** about Wlad. I respect him as athlete and as a man, but flat out I find him boring. Sure, this fight was free on the net, But in general as a boxing fan I spend my hard earned money on tickets an ppv buys, but I refuse to spend any money on a fighter I find boring to watch. Think about it this way: if you owned a restaraunt and a very significant percent of your customers complained that your food wasn't enjoyable to eat, would your reply to them be that they shouldn't complain since you're the one working hard to make their food and they don't have food service experience?
hard earned ? is it really hard earned when you compare it to what a boxer goes through mentally and physically?
owning a restaurant doesnt compare to boxing. are you getting punched in the face when you own a restaurant? no your not
I think you're missing the point of the analogy. You're basically saying any professional boxer is beyond scrutiny, how can that be true?