Tyson or K-brothers who fought better competion?

Tyson fought Lewis... just not in Tyson's prime

EDIT: oh, and Tyson fought better competition

 

It's all subjective, both took on decent enough competition to test their skills.

 

Tyson, no question. Tucker, Thomas, Holmes, Spinks are better than anyone Wlad has ever fought.

 

I think all three guys fought the best available.

 

This, also better than anyone Vitali ever fought, (Lewis does'nt count because Tyson also fought him)

you could also add Bruno, Smith, Berbick, Williams, these guys were'nt even that good but their still better wins than anyone of the Brothers wins, because the era is that bad ( thats not the brothers fault )

 

And Mikes competion was better

 

Tyson.

 

Tyson

 

Add Ruddock, Bruno, Berbick, and Golota. Bottom line he lost to Lewis and Holyfield, the two greats on his resume albeit far past prime in Lewis case. Besides Holyfield and Lewis, I would not say Tony Thompson, Eddie Chambers, Rahman, Peter, Austin, Brewster are of a lower skill level than the fighters you have listed. That is a huge question, not no question.

 

I defiantly would say they are much easy competion, than Tyson's
without question.
P.S : I can't believe I forgot to mention Ruddock early atsch

 

Tyson last 8 fights prior to Douglas loss and downfall vs Klitschko last 8 fights:

Carl Williams -- Sam Peter
Frank Bruno -- Eddie Chambers
Michael Spinks -- Ruslan Chagaev
Tony Tubbs -- Hasim Rahman
Larry Holmes -- Tony Thompson
Tyrell Biggs -- Sultan Ibragimov
Tony Tucker -- Lemon Brewster
Pinklon Thomas -- Ray Austin
James Smith -- Calvin Brock

I'd say Klitschko

 

I left out Holmes as a great too, although way passed it, still a great he did beat.

 

The 7 high lighted are clearly better the other 2 are up to debate, it should'nt really be a question if you know their history and have watched them fight.