Holding NOT LEGAL under Queensbury rules

You guys seem to forget that most of the second half Peter was initiating the clinches. I agree Wlad did seem to clinch a little too much for my liking in the first couple of rounds. I was even screaming at the screen lol but after 5th I believe, Peter was holding on on every opportunity.

 

ali vs foreman zaire.
Holding galore there........

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

Peter accepted clinches by round 6 because he had beaten downed and hugged to death. He had no pray.

 

It was from Round 4 on.

BTW. did Ali get the same talk for hugging or Holy for his dirty fighting? :huh

I think they were much worse than Wlad ever was...

 

yes, hatton is the slickest

 

Another ****ing puritan.atsch

 

I don't buy that, and I still don't buy that Peter "initiated" clinches he just accepted them and was keen on holding on when Wlad leaned in too.

You need to start thinking more because Wlad last night did it far more than Ali did. And Holyfied's dirty tactics? Yeah he leaned with his head sometimes and fought like a warrior. That aggression can lead to head-clashing but that's hardly comparable or relevant to Wlad's excessive and illegal holding.

 

Alright. What's FFS stand for by the way?

 

Peter was initiating most of the clinches in this particular fight. However I agree clinching is infuriating... look at the 2 Briggs vs Adamek fights to see a great example of how 2 boxers should conduct themselves, minimal clinching/all action.

 

WK clinches every time he punches and then wrestles and leans on the opponent to tire him out. The ref doesnt do anything because hes on his payroll.Hes a steroid user and a coward.