How Good was Felix Trinidad?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ironchamp, Sep 12, 2010.


  1. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    I've been recently watching a bit of Tito this weekend.

    I started off with the Vargas, Reid, Joppy and then Hopkins.

    At the time of Tito's run he was at some point being compared to Ray Robinson. At least Foreman compared him to Sugar, but the point was here was a guy who started off at 147 and cleaned out the division. Went up to 154 and had a great run, moved to 160 beating a very good fighter in Joppy only to lose to what we know acknowledge to being as an ATG MW champion Bernard Hopkins. Had he beaten Hopkins he would have faced seemingly invincible Roy Jones Jr. at 168. After losing, a string of Monday Morning Quarterbacks relegated him to simpleton who can be outboxed by any elite fighter.

    How good do you think he was?

    Where do you have him in your list?

    At 147?
    At 154?
     
  2. Body Head

    Body Head East Side Rape (CEO) Full Member

    2,944
    1
    Nov 15, 2009
    William Joppy is not a very good fighter at all
     
  3. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Technically, Trinidad was lousy... But, at 147, he was big and strong, so he kicked ass with power there... At 154 to 160, Trinidad was ordinary... Especially at 160 pounds... YET! Still game... However, in a time machine at 147 pounds, both "Leonard and Hearns" beats Trinidad's ass hard for the KO stoppage....

    Trinidad did indeed get a gift over DLH on PPV back in '99... DLH out-classed and exposed Trinidad's questionable skills in 1999...

    MR.BILL
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I don't think Trinidad was poor technically. He had a good heavy jab, threw nice combinations, including that double left hook, picked his shots well. He got proper leverage behind his shots.

    What I thought was poor about him were mid-fight adjustments and footwork.
     
  5. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Trinidad couldn't fight going back and could become frustrated. Overall, I am a fan and think his best was at 147. I'm still on the edge on whether to see him as an ATG or not.
     
  6. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    I like Trinidad.

    Charisma, fire power, and willingness to go out on his shield if necessary.

    Oscar "ran" in their fight.

    Gotta rate Tito over ODH.
     
  7. Body Head

    Body Head East Side Rape (CEO) Full Member

    2,944
    1
    Nov 15, 2009
    Trinidad over Oscar??? lmao what a disgrace

    just look at this Oscar has a great resume.


    Oscar de La Hoya wins


    Jorge Paez
    John John Molina
    Rafael Ruelas
    Genaro Hernandez
    Jesse James Leija
    Julio Cesar Chavez x2
    Pernell Whitaker
    Hector Camacho
    Miguel Angel Gonzalez
    Wilfredo Rivera
    Ike Quartey
    Oba Carr
    Arturo Gatti
    Javier Castillejo
    Fernando Vargas
    Luis Ramon Campas
    Felix Sturm
    Ricardo Mayorga



    losses


    Bernard Hopkins KO
    Floyd Mayweather SD
    Felix Trinidad SD
    Manny Pacquaio TKO
    Shane Mosley UD
    Shane Mosley SD




    Felix Trinidad wins

    Maurice Blocker
    Hector Camacho
    Luis Ramon Campas
    Oba Carr
    Pernell Whitaker
    Oscar De La Hoya
    Fernando Vargas
    William Joppy
    Ricardo Mayorga


    losses

    Bernard Hopkins TKO
    Winky Wright UD
     
  8. good right hand

    good right hand Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,876
    10
    Jul 26, 2004
    trinidad was a great fighter,

    he beat three gold medalist and was the first to ever beat pernell whitaker convincingly imo. his left hook was so heavy and compact. record against champions/titlist is 13-3
     
  9. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    Aside from the fact that Oscar bitched out the last 4 rounds because he wanted no part of exchanging with Tito.
     
  10. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,494
    7,259
    May 18, 2006
    A great yet flawed fighter.

    He had an awesome offensive arsenal,great power,heart and a willingness to test himself against the best.

    For the negative he had a so so chin,leaky defense,pedestrian footwork and couldn't make mid fight adjustments if his power wasn't working for him.

    Still all in all a damn entertaining fighter to watch.
     
  11. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,023
    18,286
    Jul 29, 2004
    One of my favorites when I started following the sport and I still thoroughly enjoy popping in a DVD of Tito fighting and watching him bombs dudes the **** out.

    A very good near great fighter at 147. Borderline top 10 and I actually consider him quite high in H2H rankings...against the more stationary and technically limited fighters the division has seen, even the highest level ones, I dont see him losing all that much. Of course the movers and cuties who dont have terrible durability is whats going to trouble him, even some fighters of that ilk you wouldnt consider on Tito's level alltime are going to probably upset him.

    Among the very best offensive fighters ever from that stacked division...As has been mentioned not the best ring IQ but his physical gifts and reasonably good schooling meant he rarely needed to call upon it.

    As for the Tito-Oscar fight..I scored it for Oscar, I saw him as the better fighter on the night. I do not consider that a loss for Oscar but at the same time I dont think it was decisive enough to consider it a win for him either. Unlike say for instance Pea-Chavez, which I put down as a clear win for Whitaker. Tito-DLH is one of those fights I think I just sort of look on as a no-contest when considering both guys resume at the weight.
     
  12. di tullio

    di tullio Guest

    Yet he still managed to outland Tito significantly. :huh
     
  13. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009

    I know im going against popular opinion here but i think he might have peaked at 154. He still had awesome power,timing and everything he had at Welter and didnt have to worry about making weight. I agree he slipped a little when he moved to middle.

    Id say Tito is a top 70 atg.
     
  14. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,023
    18,286
    Jul 29, 2004
    In those last 4 rounds?

    I dont recall that to be honest.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Would have been better in a 15 round setting where his marathon-esque stamina would have kicked in and submerged quite a few foes. Whilst DLH clearly beat Tito, I think Trinidad probably would have taken him out with three more rounds to go, and he probably would have bombed Quartey out too in a war over the long haul. I think he beats Forrest and Mosley too to be honest.

    Trinidad however can't be regarded in the upper echelon of welterweight greats I don't feel. He had too many weaknesses as have already been mentioned (chin would be a liability against some of the bigger welter hitters who had sturdy chins themselves, fairly limited footwork, less than stellar defense, fairly limited inside fighting ability etc.).

    Beyond that though, he simply didn't face enough quality during his day. No Quartey, no Jose Luis Lopez, no (relevant) Whitaker, no McGirt, no Espana. His welterweight reign was subpar by any historical measure taking away the DLH 'win' (which I wouldn't class as a win). I don't think it even rates a mention in the top 50 welterweight's accomplishments all time.

    Was somewhat overrated over welterweight I feel, though he did notch a few nice wins, the peak being Vargas, who was a better fighter back in the day than most remember him to be....