Klitscko vs Haye, Why not 60/40 ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by wlad1111, Sep 14, 2010.


  1. wlad1111

    wlad1111 Active Member Full Member

    954
    0
    Jul 10, 2009
    Both fighters have stated that there is no doubt in their minds that they will win. If I was Klitschko I would offer Haye 60 winner 40 loser option plus just agree to pay Haye that TV money he wanted so badly if he were to win the fight. Throw in some KO bonus money and now there is no way Haye can make up anything. If he is what he claims to be than he has a chance to prove that and also earn more money than Klit for this mega fight. If not he gets short end of the stick and retires in shame. Besides Adamek there is no one out there who would generate any interest. I think Adamek is a good fighers but he is just to small and would get crushed.
     
  2. VecArrow

    VecArrow Custom User Title Full Member

    6,776
    3
    Apr 23, 2010
    That's a lot of money going around that can end up in the judges/referee's pockets.
     
  3. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    i would love those kind of deals for all fights but it never works in boxing due to dodgy officiating.

    Wlads offer to Haye was good. Hayes counter off was good. Both should of accepted.
     
  4. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    Truth. :good
     
  5. jonnytightlips

    jonnytightlips Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,384
    1
    Aug 1, 2008
    Why sont they just make a deal like whoever wins gets the most money. I believe it would make for a better fight.