Is Wlad's power Foremanesque?

by far? :nut

it's ok to believe this, but it's simply not true. If - at all - it is superior due to different technique - but not "far".

 

You mean the guys actually standng in there and taking the punches? Yeah, **** those guys. Ya can't trust 'em. :roll:

 

I wonder what would happen if they let Wlad loose on some of the 190 pounders that George Foreman fought.

 

Look at that shot Wlad landed on Botha, it totally deformed his skull.

This content is protected

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Foreman was in his prime in the 70's, when guys punched harder than they do now, so this is no contest really.

 

he would paw at them for 10 rounds until steward loses it and forces him to go for the ko.

 

:good

 

Well Placed shots on bums that arnt considered average vs well Placed shots on Historical Legends in not only Boxing but Sports in General as a whole, are two diffrent things.

 

Joe Frazier would Ice him with a Left Hook

 

Nah. Wlad's power is not comparable to Foreman's, not at all. Wlad doesn't hit as hard as Lewis did.

 

Guys punched harder in the 70? Pls tell me your kidding....

Foreman was a big hitter and a lump for 70's...
He was a mummy that telegraphed his punches..

The year is 2010...

So no, not really.

 

When you get into this kind of brutal power, you can't say one has more than another.

I get a kick out of how the fighters from past decades are risen to a higher level merely cause they are from the past.............

Foreman was a powerful KO puncher, but so is Wlad.........

If you want to compare eras, as a whole..........the fighters today have better nutrition which can only result in more strength in the long run, overall.

 

so foreman was able to knockout mother****ers with poor technique?

he must be stronger than we imagined!

 

The man spent most of his early career knocking out cruiserweights...

Comparing fighters from different areas is pure exercise in aids..

 

There ya go.